A Survey of Open Educational Resources Practices in Health Sciences Libraries and Medical Education

Objective: The object of this study was to survey the practices for open educational resources (OER) in health sciences libraries. Methods: Participants were recruited via email to appropriate listservs and volunteers were interviewed by the paper's authors. Results: Five volunteers were interviewed. Most of the interviewees expressed that there is a willingness to use open materials at their institutions but support for creating open educational materials is lacking. The librarians discussed their involvement with OER at their libraries and institutions and provided advice for librarians hoping to support OER at their libraries and institutions. Conclusion: While health sciences libraries and medical faculty are open to OER, many factors hinder the adoption and creation of OER in medical education. The use of gold standard texts in medical education creates challenges in veering from those texts, as does the challenge of understanding copyright restrictions regarding OER and the lack of institutional support for faculty who wish to create OER. A shift to embracing OER in medical education will require a larger shift in the culture of medical education.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26207/v7yx-e077
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Survey of Open Educational Resources Practices in Health Sciences Libraries and Medical Education

ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
article

A Survey of Open Educational Resources Practices in Health Sciences Libraries and Medical Education

article en

Abstract

Objective: The object of this study was to survey the practices for open educational resources (OER) in health sciences libraries. Methods: Participants were recruited via email to appropriate listservs and volunteers were interviewed by the paper's authors. Results: Five volunteers were interviewed. Most of the interviewees expressed that there is a willingness to use open materials at their institutions but support for creating open educational materials is lacking. The librarians discussed their involvement with OER at their libraries and institutions and provided advice for librarians hoping to support OER at their libraries and institutions. Conclusion: While health sciences libraries and medical faculty are open to OER, many factors hinder the adoption and creation of OER in medical education. The use of gold standard texts in medical education creates challenges in veering from those texts, as does the challenge of understanding copyright restrictions regarding OER and the lack of institutional support for faculty who wish to create OER. A shift to embracing OER in medical education will require a larger shift in the culture of medical education.

ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Survey of Open Educational Resources Practices in Health Sciences Libraries and Medical Education · ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS