How Multilingual Writers Talk About, Write About, And Engage With Sources in First-Year Composition

This study makes a contribution to the rhetoric and composition field by documenting the research and writing processes of a diverse group of 15 multilingual writers in first-year composition (FYC) at a small private southeastern university. I collected and analyzed data from three assignments: 1) a video think-aloud capturing participants’ first online search for sources, 2) a two-page reflection on the use of sources in the first full draft of students’ research paper, and 3) their first full draft of the research paper. The study is the first to systematically examine how multilingual writers in FYC at a U.S. university engage with sources from the start of approaching a research-paper assignment through writing a first full draft. The study adapted methods from two large-scale studies—Learning Information Literacy Across the Curriculum (LILAC) and the Citation Project (Blackwell-Starnes and Walker; Jamieson and Howard). While the study’s findings emerge primarily from qualitative data and interpretation, the results are supported with quantitative data and analysis in a mixed-methods approach. The study’s findings show that the 15 study participants learned a great deal about the expectations of the “community of practice” (Lave and Wenger) of the FYC classroom. In particular, they acquired the language of the “community of practice.” A critical number of participants explained the why or how of “paraphrasing” or use of “quotation.” They referred to “peer-reviewed” sources. However, results were uneven among participants in demonstrating understanding of the expectations of practice in the FYC classroom. Four students showed continuity by integrating source material in their research paper from a source that they had found in their first online search. Students’ papers contained 15 instances of what I call “sustained paraphrasing”—including at least three sentences that restate content from a particular source. However, only five of those examples of sustained paraphrasing were effective. The study shows the need for more research on pedagogical models for teaching multilingual writers in FYC the functions of sources and meaningful integration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/9q59-b307
Primary Topic
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Multilingual Writers Talk About, Write About, And Engage With Sources in First-Year Composition

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
article

How Multilingual Writers Talk About, Write About, And Engage With Sources in First-Year Composition

article en

Abstract

This study makes a contribution to the rhetoric and composition field by documenting the research and writing processes of a diverse group of 15 multilingual writers in first-year composition (FYC) at a small private southeastern university. I collected and analyzed data from three assignments: 1) a video think-aloud capturing participants’ first online search for sources, 2) a two-page reflection on the use of sources in the first full draft of students’ research paper, and 3) their first full draft of the research paper. The study is the first to systematically examine how multilingual writers in FYC at a U.S. university engage with sources from the start of approaching a research-paper assignment through writing a first full draft. The study adapted methods from two large-scale studies—Learning Information Literacy Across the Curriculum (LILAC) and the Citation Project (Blackwell-Starnes and Walker; Jamieson and Howard). While the study’s findings emerge primarily from qualitative data and interpretation, the results are supported with quantitative data and analysis in a mixed-methods approach. The study’s findings show that the 15 study participants learned a great deal about the expectations of the “community of practice” (Lave and Wenger) of the FYC classroom. In particular, they acquired the language of the “community of practice.” A critical number of participants explained the why or how of “paraphrasing” or use of “quotation.” They referred to “peer-reviewed” sources. However, results were uneven among participants in demonstrating understanding of the expectations of practice in the FYC classroom. Four students showed continuity by integrating source material in their research paper from a source that they had found in their first online search. Students’ papers contained 15 instances of what I call “sustained paraphrasing”—including at least three sentences that restate content from a particular source. However, only five of those examples of sustained paraphrasing were effective. The study shows the need for more research on pedagogical models for teaching multilingual writers in FYC the functions of sources and meaningful integration.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.