Sustaining the Future Through Addressing the Past: The Transitional Justice Functions of Biocultural Community Protocols

Biocultural Community Protocols (BCPs) represent legal mechanisms for indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) to assert collective regulatory rights to genetic resources associated with traditional knowledge. BCPs inherently speak to power asymmetries between state and subnational actors. Yet the literature on BCPs has insufficiently engaged with questions of whether, how, and the extent to which BCP author communities utilise these protocols to demand redress for past harms which have constituted those asymmetrical power conditions. Seeking to connect scholarship on BCPs with the transitional justice literature, I explore three hypotheses positing mechanisms by which IPLCs are leveraging BCPs to assert transitional justice demands. I then evaluate these hypotheses through analysis of the 34 BCPs registered with the United Nations ABS Clearing House.

Publication Details

Journal
SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25501/soas.00506365
Primary Topic
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustaining the Future Through Addressing the Past: The Transitional Justice Functions of Biocultural Community Protocols

SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
article

Sustaining the Future Through Addressing the Past: The Transitional Justice Functions of Biocultural Community Protocols

article en

Abstract

Biocultural Community Protocols (BCPs) represent legal mechanisms for indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) to assert collective regulatory rights to genetic resources associated with traditional knowledge. BCPs inherently speak to power asymmetries between state and subnational actors. Yet the literature on BCPs has insufficiently engaged with questions of whether, how, and the extent to which BCP author communities utilise these protocols to demand redress for past harms which have constituted those asymmetrical power conditions. Seeking to connect scholarship on BCPs with the transitional justice literature, I explore three hypotheses positing mechanisms by which IPLCs are leveraging BCPs to assert transitional justice demands. I then evaluate these hypotheses through analysis of the 34 BCPs registered with the United Nations ABS Clearing House.

SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.