The comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancementon foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster settraining configurations

Background: There is no study about the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in different set configurations. This study aimed to compare the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations. Methods: The study included 27 volunteer university students (age: 20.0 ± 1.2 year, height: 180.2 ± 6.9 cm, body weight: 76.0 ± 11.8 kg). Static foot plantar pressure (SFPP), countermovement jump (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ) were performed as pre-tests 8 min after the half-squat 1 repetition maximum (HS 1RM) test. After pre-tests, 12 reps of training were performed with 70% of the HS 1RM by varying the training configurations of 1 × 12 reps traditional set (TS) on the 4th day, 3 × 4 reps cluster set 1 (CS1) with 30 s rest on the 8th day, and 6 × 2 reps cluster set 2 (CS2) with 10 s rest on the 12th day. Post-tests were performed in the following of each configuration. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for the statistical comparison of the tests in four different time intervals. Results: There were no statistically significant SFPP differences in four different time periods, while statistically significant differences were found in the CMJ (p < 0.001) and SJ (p = 0.002). Pairwise comparisons showed that CMJ pre-test (CMJPRE) had statistically significant differences with CMJTS, CMJCS1 and CMJCS2. There were also differences between SJPRE and SJCS1, SJTS and SJCS2 for the SJ (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, based on the results of the study, it is recommended to use any of the TS, CS1 and CS2 configurations to increase CMJ and to use the CS1 configuration to increase SJ as a performance enhancement at 8 min post-activity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2025.038
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancementon foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster settraining configurations

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

The comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancementon foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster settraining configurations

article en

Abstract

Background: There is no study about the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in different set configurations. This study aimed to compare the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations. Methods: The study included 27 volunteer university students (age: 20.0 ± 1.2 year, height: 180.2 ± 6.9 cm, body weight: 76.0 ± 11.8 kg). Static foot plantar pressure (SFPP), countermovement jump (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ) were performed as pre-tests 8 min after the half-squat 1 repetition maximum (HS 1RM) test. After pre-tests, 12 reps of training were performed with 70% of the HS 1RM by varying the training configurations of 1 × 12 reps traditional set (TS) on the 4th day, 3 × 4 reps cluster set 1 (CS1) with 30 s rest on the 8th day, and 6 × 2 reps cluster set 2 (CS2) with 10 s rest on the 12th day. Post-tests were performed in the following of each configuration. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for the statistical comparison of the tests in four different time intervals. Results: There were no statistically significant SFPP differences in four different time periods, while statistically significant differences were found in the CMJ (p < 0.001) and SJ (p = 0.002). Pairwise comparisons showed that CMJ pre-test (CMJPRE) had statistically significant differences with CMJTS, CMJCS1 and CMJCS2. There were also differences between SJPRE and SJCS1, SJTS and SJCS2 for the SJ (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, based on the results of the study, it is recommended to use any of the TS, CS1 and CS2 configurations to increase CMJ and to use the CS1 configuration to increase SJ as a performance enhancement at 8 min post-activity.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Eskisehir Technical University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul Foundation for Research and Education (TR), Gedik University (TR), Istanbul University (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.