KAFI-NOONOO TEXT SUMMARIZATION WITH A DEEP LEARNING APPROACH

The technique of reducing a lengthy text to a manageable length while maintaining its essential concepts and points are known as text summary. Its goal is to give a concise synopsis that encapsulates the main ideas of the original work. In text summarization, there are two main approaches: the extractive approach and the abstractive approach. In order to provide a succinct summary, extractive text summarizing entails determining the important details by picking out key sentences or phrases from the source text. The technique of creating an internal semantic representation of the source text and rewriting it in new words using natural language processing is known as abstractive text summarization. Extractive text summarization is the main focus of this study. There is no available text summarization research for the Kafi-noonoo language. The main objective of this study is to develop Kafinoonoo text summarizer models with a deep learning approach. For the purpose of this study, 402 kafi-noonoo texts with summaries were used as input documents. Consequently, three deep learning models were proposed in this study: CNN (convolutional neural network), LSTM (long short-term memory), and Bi-LSTM (bi-directional long short-term memory) to perform a comparison analysis for a Kafi-noonoo dataset. So, the developed models for Kafinoonoo language eliminate the mentioned problems of content selection bias, information overload, and wasting time, effort, and materials. In our experiments, the result indicates that the LSTM model achieves precision 98.2%, recall 98.6%, F1 score 98.1%, accuracy 93% and 98.5% of validation accuracy and 96.7% of training accuracy; Bi-LSTM scores precision 98.3%, recall 99.2%, F1 score 98.6%, accuracy 98% and 98.6% of validation accuracy and 97.8% of training accuracy; and the CNN model scores precision 88%, recall 87%, F1 score 93.9%, accuracy 93.5% and 94% of validation accuracy and 93.6% of training accuracy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre:16164
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KAFI-NOONOO TEXT SUMMARIZATION WITH A DEEP LEARNING APPROACH

National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

KAFI-NOONOO TEXT SUMMARIZATION WITH A DEEP LEARNING APPROACH

article en

Abstract

The technique of reducing a lengthy text to a manageable length while maintaining its essential concepts and points are known as text summary. Its goal is to give a concise synopsis that encapsulates the main ideas of the original work. In text summarization, there are two main approaches: the extractive approach and the abstractive approach. In order to provide a succinct summary, extractive text summarizing entails determining the important details by picking out key sentences or phrases from the source text. The technique of creating an internal semantic representation of the source text and rewriting it in new words using natural language processing is known as abstractive text summarization. Extractive text summarization is the main focus of this study. There is no available text summarization research for the Kafi-noonoo language. The main objective of this study is to develop Kafinoonoo text summarizer models with a deep learning approach. For the purpose of this study, 402 kafi-noonoo texts with summaries were used as input documents. Consequently, three deep learning models were proposed in this study: CNN (convolutional neural network), LSTM (long short-term memory), and Bi-LSTM (bi-directional long short-term memory) to perform a comparison analysis for a Kafi-noonoo dataset. So, the developed models for Kafinoonoo language eliminate the mentioned problems of content selection bias, information overload, and wasting time, effort, and materials. In our experiments, the result indicates that the LSTM model achieves precision 98.2%, recall 98.6%, F1 score 98.1%, accuracy 93% and 98.5% of validation accuracy and 96.7% of training accuracy; Bi-LSTM scores precision 98.3%, recall 99.2%, F1 score 98.6%, accuracy 98% and 98.6% of validation accuracy and 97.8% of training accuracy; and the CNN model scores precision 88%, recall 87%, F1 score 93.9%, accuracy 93.5% and 94% of validation accuracy and 93.6% of training accuracy.

National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Mattu University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

KAFI-NOONOO TEXT SUMMARIZATION WITH A DEEP LEARNING APPROACH · National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS