Optimizing clinical risk stratification of localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current risk and prognostic stratification systems in localised prostate cancer. To explore some of the most promising adjuncts to clinical models and what the evidence has shown regarding their value. RECENT FINDINGS: There are many new biomarker-based models seeking to improve, optimise or replace clinical models. There are promising data on the value of MRI, radiomics, genomic classifiers and most recently artificial intelligence tools in refining stratification. Despite the extensive literature however, there remains uncertainty on where in pathways they can provide the most benefit and whether a biomarker is most useful for prognosis or predictive use. Comparisons studies have also often overlooked the fact that clinical models have themselves evolved and the context of the baseline used in biomarker studies that have shown superiority have to be considered. SUMMARY: For new biomarkers to be included in stratification models, well designed prospective clinical trials are needed. Until then, there needs to be caution in interpretation of their use for day-to-day decision making. It is critical that users balance any purported incremental value against the performance of the latest clinical classification and multivariate models especially as the latter are cost free and widely available.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.117504
Primary Topic
Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing clinical risk stratification of localized prostate cancer.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Actinomycetales infections and treatment
article

Optimizing clinical risk stratification of localized prostate cancer.

article en

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current risk and prognostic stratification systems in localised prostate cancer. To explore some of the most promising adjuncts to clinical models and what the evidence has shown regarding their value. RECENT FINDINGS: There are many new biomarker-based models seeking to improve, optimise or replace clinical models. There are promising data on the value of MRI, radiomics, genomic classifiers and most recently artificial intelligence tools in refining stratification. Despite the extensive literature however, there remains uncertainty on where in pathways they can provide the most benefit and whether a biomarker is most useful for prognosis or predictive use. Comparisons studies have also often overlooked the fact that clinical models have themselves evolved and the context of the baseline used in biomarker studies that have shown superiority have to be considered. SUMMARY: For new biomarkers to be included in stratification models, well designed prospective clinical trials are needed. Until then, there needs to be caution in interpretation of their use for day-to-day decision making. It is critical that users balance any purported incremental value against the performance of the latest clinical classification and multivariate models especially as the latter are cost free and widely available.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Actinomycetales infections and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing clinical risk stratification of localized prostate cancer. · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS