The risky business of research: the control of academic knowledge production and the racialised and gendered contours of corporate power

This article examines attempts to censor academic knowledge production and expertise on corporate power. It provides an ethnographically grounded way of illuminating one corporation’s attempts to control academic research as the company worked to maintain its hegemony in the face of a long history of public accusations of labour abuse. Reflecting on the author's own experience of negotiating fieldwork and publishing, the analysis reveals what antagonisms provoke corporate control of information, what social relations may ease corporate anxiety and what ultimately, regardless of these social relations, prompts corporations to protect themselves, often irrespective of the truth. In doing so, the article reveals the racialised, gendered and classed contours of corporate power and abuse.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.111653
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The risky business of research: the control of academic knowledge production and the racialised and gendered contours of corporate power

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

The risky business of research: the control of academic knowledge production and the racialised and gendered contours of corporate power

article en

Abstract

This article examines attempts to censor academic knowledge production and expertise on corporate power. It provides an ethnographically grounded way of illuminating one corporation’s attempts to control academic research as the company worked to maintain its hegemony in the face of a long history of public accusations of labour abuse. Reflecting on the author's own experience of negotiating fieldwork and publishing, the analysis reveals what antagonisms provoke corporate control of information, what social relations may ease corporate anxiety and what ultimately, regardless of these social relations, prompts corporations to protect themselves, often irrespective of the truth. In doing so, the article reveals the racialised, gendered and classed contours of corporate power and abuse.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.