'Just' as a scale widener with maximum-standard adjectives: emphatic / precisifying effects

In this paper, we propose a finer-grained classification of adjectives labeled Maximum Standard Adjectives (MSAs) in order to account for two of their properties in interaction with the particle 'just'. First is the failure of non-extreme MSAs ('clean', 'closed' etc.) to be interpreted emphatically with 'just' – in contrast to MSAs like 'perfect' (Beltrama, 2021). The second property has to do with the non-uniform availability of a precisifying reading for MSAs in combination with focused 'just'. While we assume (like Rotstein and Winter, 2004 and Lassiter and Goodman, 2013) that threshold values for MSAs are uniformly provided by the context, we show that MSAs also vary with respect to how these thresholds are sourced from the context. The non-uniform behavior of MSAs with 'just' in its emphatic and precisifying uses is shown to derive from this variability.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v28.1168
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pregnancy-related medical research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

'Just' as a scale widener with maximum-standard adjectives: emphatic / precisifying effects

1 citations
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Pregnancy-related medical research
0.54
article

'Just' as a scale widener with maximum-standard adjectives: emphatic / precisifying effects

article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a finer-grained classification of adjectives labeled Maximum Standard Adjectives (MSAs) in order to account for two of their properties in interaction with the particle 'just'. First is the failure of non-extreme MSAs ('clean', 'closed' etc.) to be interpreted emphatically with 'just' – in contrast to MSAs like 'perfect' (Beltrama, 2021). The second property has to do with the non-uniform availability of a precisifying reading for MSAs in combination with focused 'just'. While we assume (like Rotstein and Winter, 2004 and Lassiter and Goodman, 2013) that threshold values for MSAs are uniformly provided by the context, we show that MSAs also vary with respect to how these thresholds are sourced from the context. The non-uniform behavior of MSAs with 'just' in its emphatic and precisifying uses is shown to derive from this variability.

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Pregnancy-related medical research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.