Linguistic gentrification

This is a study of how, between 1882 and roughly 1940, missionaries of the Baptist Missionary Society (BMS) working on the left bank of the western sections of the Congo River “engaged” and “engaged with” the Bantu language Bobangi. It traces the ways in which and the reasons why, for their missionary and school work, they decided to turn to, and later away from, Bobangi. It addresses the changes the motives and linguistic ideologies behind these choices went through, as well as the doubts, disagreements, and conflicts visible in the BMS’s own ranks. In this context, I particularly zoom in on the metalinguistic representations the BMS made of the language, in publications such as John Whitehead’s Grammar and Dictionary of the Bobangi Language of 1899. I suggest the notion of “linguistic gentrification”, i.e. the missionary creation of an “embellished” and “improved” version of the language, which was imposed back onto the native speakers in missionary schools as the new, only correct way of speaking, resulting in the exclusion of these native speakers from their own language – indeed in much the same way as gentrification operates in urbanization.

Publication Details

Journal
Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/aaeo/2023_3493
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic gentrification

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Linguistic gentrification

article en

Abstract

This is a study of how, between 1882 and roughly 1940, missionaries of the Baptist Missionary Society (BMS) working on the left bank of the western sections of the Congo River “engaged” and “engaged with” the Bantu language Bobangi. It traces the ways in which and the reasons why, for their missionary and school work, they decided to turn to, and later away from, Bobangi. It addresses the changes the motives and linguistic ideologies behind these choices went through, as well as the doubts, disagreements, and conflicts visible in the BMS’s own ranks. In this context, I particularly zoom in on the metalinguistic representations the BMS made of the language, in publications such as John Whitehead’s Grammar and Dictionary of the Bobangi Language of 1899. I suggest the notion of “linguistic gentrification”, i.e. the missionary creation of an “embellished” and “improved” version of the language, which was imposed back onto the native speakers in missionary schools as the new, only correct way of speaking, resulting in the exclusion of these native speakers from their own language – indeed in much the same way as gentrification operates in urbanization.

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Linguistic gentrification · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS