Wir Körperbehinderten wollen aber ebenfalls keine Krüppel mehr sein

This paper examines the lexical and semantic change of Behinderung ‘disability’ in 20th and 21st century Germany. It establishes a linguistic perspective on the emergence and disappearance of different linguistic expressions such as Krüppel ‘cripple’, erbkrank ‘hereditarily ill’, kriegsbeschädigt ‘damaged in war’ or schwerbeschädigt ‘severely damaged’. Quantitative corpus linguistic methods document that the adjectival modifier behindert ‘disabled’ and the nominalization Behinderte(r) have emerged from the verb behindern ‘to disable’ via a passive construction with the past participle (jemand ist behindert) and a predicative adjective usage. Qualitative analyses of discourses on disability show that the dichotomy of behindert/nichtbehindert was established due to a striving for political visibility and empowerment. Consequently, since the 1970s, various internally differentiated and hierarchized groups have been collectivized under one label. The paper also examines critical voices from the so-called cripple movement as well as current linguistic trends.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/zs/2025-2004
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wir Körperbehinderten wollen aber ebenfalls keine Krüppel mehr sein

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Wir Körperbehinderten wollen aber ebenfalls keine Krüppel mehr sein

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the lexical and semantic change of Behinderung ‘disability’ in 20th and 21st century Germany. It establishes a linguistic perspective on the emergence and disappearance of different linguistic expressions such as Krüppel ‘cripple’, erbkrank ‘hereditarily ill’, kriegsbeschädigt ‘damaged in war’ or schwerbeschädigt ‘severely damaged’. Quantitative corpus linguistic methods document that the adjectival modifier behindert ‘disabled’ and the nominalization Behinderte(r) have emerged from the verb behindern ‘to disable’ via a passive construction with the past participle (jemand ist behindert) and a predicative adjective usage. Qualitative analyses of discourses on disability show that the dichotomy of behindert/nichtbehindert was established due to a striving for political visibility and empowerment. Consequently, since the 1970s, various internally differentiated and hierarchized groups have been collectivized under one label. The paper also examines critical voices from the so-called cripple movement as well as current linguistic trends.

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wir Körperbehinderten wollen aber ebenfalls keine Krüppel mehr sein · Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS