THE CENTROMERE EFFECT IN D. MELANOGASTER

The centromere effect (CE) is a meiotic crossover (CO) patterning phenomenon that ensures CO suppression in pericentromeric regions. Despite being a critical safeguard against nondisjunction and aneuploidy, the mechanisms behind the CE remain unknown. My dissertation research focuses on this gap in knowledge at two levels. First, I ask how spatial/structural aspects of chromosome biology contribute to the CE. I use phenotypic recombination mapping to investigate whether dosage changes in centromere number and repetitive DNA content affect CE strength. I also study the importance of centromere-clustering on pericentromeric CO suppression using flies exhibiting substantial centromere declustering in meiotic nuclei. Despite what previous studies suggest, my results show that the Drosophila CE is robust to changes in centromere number, repetitive DNA content, and centromere-declustering, leading us to conclude that the CE is unlikely to be spatially controlled. These observations inspired me to switch vantage points and look at the CE at a more local level, focusing on the contributions of various genetic mutants. Previous research has shown that various regions of the Drosophila pericentromere, encompassing proximal euchromatin, beta and alpha heterochromatin, undergo varying levels of crossover suppression, raising the question of whether distinct mechanisms establish the CE in these different regions. To address this, I asked whether different pericentromeric regions respond differently to mutations that impair various features implicated in establishing the CE. I look at flies mutant for an essential synaptonemal complex (SC) gene, two meiotic recombination genes, and a heterochromatin formation gene, expecting different regions of the pericentromere to display differing sensitivity to each class of mutant. Surprisingly, I observed a significant redistribution of pericentromeric crossovers from proximal euchromatin towards heterochromatin in the SC and meiotic recombination mutants, and no change in pericentromeric crossover distribution in the heterochromatin mutant. This suggests that meiotic machinery is more important for heterochromatic crossover suppression than chromatin state. Combined, both studies point towards the CE being unaffected by spatial factors and instead being primarily mediated genetically and through the meiotic program, providing novel insight into the mechanisms behind this CO patterning event in Drosophila.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/jzqh-d477
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE CENTROMERE EFFECT IN D. MELANOGASTER

UNC Libraries
Genetics and Plant Breeding
article

THE CENTROMERE EFFECT IN D. MELANOGASTER

article en

Abstract

The centromere effect (CE) is a meiotic crossover (CO) patterning phenomenon that ensures CO suppression in pericentromeric regions. Despite being a critical safeguard against nondisjunction and aneuploidy, the mechanisms behind the CE remain unknown. My dissertation research focuses on this gap in knowledge at two levels. First, I ask how spatial/structural aspects of chromosome biology contribute to the CE. I use phenotypic recombination mapping to investigate whether dosage changes in centromere number and repetitive DNA content affect CE strength. I also study the importance of centromere-clustering on pericentromeric CO suppression using flies exhibiting substantial centromere declustering in meiotic nuclei. Despite what previous studies suggest, my results show that the Drosophila CE is robust to changes in centromere number, repetitive DNA content, and centromere-declustering, leading us to conclude that the CE is unlikely to be spatially controlled. These observations inspired me to switch vantage points and look at the CE at a more local level, focusing on the contributions of various genetic mutants. Previous research has shown that various regions of the Drosophila pericentromere, encompassing proximal euchromatin, beta and alpha heterochromatin, undergo varying levels of crossover suppression, raising the question of whether distinct mechanisms establish the CE in these different regions. To address this, I asked whether different pericentromeric regions respond differently to mutations that impair various features implicated in establishing the CE. I look at flies mutant for an essential synaptonemal complex (SC) gene, two meiotic recombination genes, and a heterochromatin formation gene, expecting different regions of the pericentromere to display differing sensitivity to each class of mutant. Surprisingly, I observed a significant redistribution of pericentromeric crossovers from proximal euchromatin towards heterochromatin in the SC and meiotic recombination mutants, and no change in pericentromeric crossover distribution in the heterochromatin mutant. This suggests that meiotic machinery is more important for heterochromatic crossover suppression than chromatin state. Combined, both studies point towards the CE being unaffected by spatial factors and instead being primarily mediated genetically and through the meiotic program, providing novel insight into the mechanisms behind this CO patterning event in Drosophila.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.