The Fireblight menace : knowledge communities and their response to crop disease in the Anglo-world, 1880-1939

This thesis utilises the orchard disease ‘Fireblight’ as a means to explore the various communities involved in the creation and communication of horticultural knowledge in the Anglo-world (particularly the USA, Canada, and New Zealand) between 18801939. In the nineteenth century, Fireblight ravaged orchards in the United States and Canada, swiftly becoming endemic. In 1919, it spread to New Zealand, the first time it was recorded outside North America. Studying Fireblight enables us to shift the focus of histories of imperial horticulture and agricultural science from Britain’s tropical colonies to the dominions, and into a wider ‘Anglo-world' in which the British state was far less involved in directing scientific research. By investigating how the various communities of scientists, fruitgrowers, politicians, and civil servants, in Canada, the United States, and New Zealand, developed their understandings of how to deal with this culturally and biologically distinctive crop disease, this thesis explores both how each community developed a consensus, and also how knowledge moved between these communities. Each of these heterogenous groups had to navigate the interplay of practical and theoretical scientific knowledge concerning Fireblight in their efforts to claim expertise. The fruitgrowing communities and scientific institutions of the United States and Canada grew up with Fireblight, and expertise and experience was shared between both communities. In contrast, when the disease reached New Zealand, the relative infancy of the fruitgrowing sector meant civil servants and government scientists could claim greater expertise than fruitgrowers. Thus, the contrast between North America and New Zealand illustrates not only that scientists, fruitgrowers, and civil servants were all involved in shaping knowledge creation and communication practices, albeit with different priorities, but that the relationships between those communities depended on place and time.

Publication Details

Journal
St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/1257
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Fireblight menace : knowledge communities and their response to crop disease in the Anglo-world, 1880-1939

St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

The Fireblight menace : knowledge communities and their response to crop disease in the Anglo-world, 1880-1939

article en

Abstract

This thesis utilises the orchard disease ‘Fireblight’ as a means to explore the various communities involved in the creation and communication of horticultural knowledge in the Anglo-world (particularly the USA, Canada, and New Zealand) between 18801939. In the nineteenth century, Fireblight ravaged orchards in the United States and Canada, swiftly becoming endemic. In 1919, it spread to New Zealand, the first time it was recorded outside North America. Studying Fireblight enables us to shift the focus of histories of imperial horticulture and agricultural science from Britain’s tropical colonies to the dominions, and into a wider ‘Anglo-world' in which the British state was far less involved in directing scientific research. By investigating how the various communities of scientists, fruitgrowers, politicians, and civil servants, in Canada, the United States, and New Zealand, developed their understandings of how to deal with this culturally and biologically distinctive crop disease, this thesis explores both how each community developed a consensus, and also how knowledge moved between these communities. Each of these heterogenous groups had to navigate the interplay of practical and theoretical scientific knowledge concerning Fireblight in their efforts to claim expertise. The fruitgrowing communities and scientific institutions of the United States and Canada grew up with Fireblight, and expertise and experience was shared between both communities. In contrast, when the disease reached New Zealand, the relative infancy of the fruitgrowing sector meant civil servants and government scientists could claim greater expertise than fruitgrowers. Thus, the contrast between North America and New Zealand illustrates not only that scientists, fruitgrowers, and civil servants were all involved in shaping knowledge creation and communication practices, albeit with different priorities, but that the relationships between those communities depended on place and time.

St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, British Society for the History of Science, University of St Andrews
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Fireblight menace : knowledge communities and their response to crop disease in the Anglo-world, 1880-1939 · St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS