A interpretação dos particípios κατέχον/κατέχων em 2 Tessalonicenses 2,6.7: uma proposta não identitária

The 2Ts 2,1-17 pericope is one of the most difficult passages to interpret in the New Testament. Its Greek is known to be irregular and inaccurate: many elliptical phrases, obscure terms and disconcerting linguistic turns. Furthermore, the whole matter is presented so vaguely that it is not easy to clarify. In this article, the historical, literary and textual contexts of the pericope will be investigated.The sentences will also be analyzed:ἡ ἡμέρα του κυρίου; ἡ ἀποστασία and ὁ ἄνθρωπος της ἀνομίας for being in connection with the participatory phrases τὸ κατέχον and ὁ κατέχων. Finally, it will be suggested that the author of 2 Thessalonians did not claim that the identification of τὸ κατέχον and ὁ κατέχων could be known to readers outside the community of the original recipients. The key to understanding written teaching was reminiscent of an oral speech: οὐ μνημονεύετε ταῦτα ἔλεγονὑ μῖν.The modern interpreter does not have that key.

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/sta0-aj82
Primary Topic
Research in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A interpretação dos particípios κατέχον/κατέχων em 2 Tessalonicenses 2,6.7: uma proposta não identitária

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Research in Social Sciences
article

A interpretação dos particípios κατέχον/κατέχων em 2 Tessalonicenses 2,6.7: uma proposta não identitária

article en

Abstract

The 2Ts 2,1-17 pericope is one of the most difficult passages to interpret in the New Testament. Its Greek is known to be irregular and inaccurate: many elliptical phrases, obscure terms and disconcerting linguistic turns. Furthermore, the whole matter is presented so vaguely that it is not easy to clarify. In this article, the historical, literary and textual contexts of the pericope will be investigated.The sentences will also be analyzed:ἡ ἡμέρα του κυρίου; ἡ ἀποστασία and ὁ ἄνθρωπος της ἀνομίας for being in connection with the participatory phrases τὸ κατέχον and ὁ κατέχων. Finally, it will be suggested that the author of 2 Thessalonians did not claim that the identification of τὸ κατέχον and ὁ κατέχων could be known to readers outside the community of the original recipients. The key to understanding written teaching was reminiscent of an oral speech: οὐ μνημονεύετε ταῦτα ἔλεγονὑ μῖν.The modern interpreter does not have that key.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Research in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.