ASSESSING CROWDSOURCED OSINT: THE EFFECTIVENESS AND OBJECTIVITY OF X’S COMMUNITY NOTES AGAINST DISINFORMATION

The use of crowdsourced open-source intelligence (OSINT) may be valuable in countering the rapid spread of disinformation campaigns. This study examines the effectiveness of X’s Community Notes using a mixed-methods approach to assess how quickly disinformation is detected and whether corrections are influenced by bias or grounded in truth-seeking. Automated OSINT tools were used to collect Community Notes, followed by tonal analysis to detect bias. Findings show that most disinformation was identified within 24 hours, suggesting crowdsourced OSINT enables timely responses. However, about one-third of Community Notes showed negative tonal bias, raising concerns about impartiality. While the results highlight the potential of crowdsourced OSINT for rapid fact-checking, they also reveal limitations in neutrality and accessibility. The study concludes by calling for improved methods and institutional guidance to increase the reliability of crowdsourced OSINT in fighting disinformation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/srq7-ka10
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSESSING CROWDSOURCED OSINT: THE EFFECTIVENESS AND OBJECTIVITY OF X’S COMMUNITY NOTES AGAINST DISINFORMATION

UNC Libraries
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

ASSESSING CROWDSOURCED OSINT: THE EFFECTIVENESS AND OBJECTIVITY OF X’S COMMUNITY NOTES AGAINST DISINFORMATION

article en

Abstract

The use of crowdsourced open-source intelligence (OSINT) may be valuable in countering the rapid spread of disinformation campaigns. This study examines the effectiveness of X’s Community Notes using a mixed-methods approach to assess how quickly disinformation is detected and whether corrections are influenced by bias or grounded in truth-seeking. Automated OSINT tools were used to collect Community Notes, followed by tonal analysis to detect bias. Findings show that most disinformation was identified within 24 hours, suggesting crowdsourced OSINT enables timely responses. However, about one-third of Community Notes showed negative tonal bias, raising concerns about impartiality. While the results highlight the potential of crowdsourced OSINT for rapid fact-checking, they also reveal limitations in neutrality and accessibility. The study concludes by calling for improved methods and institutional guidance to increase the reliability of crowdsourced OSINT in fighting disinformation.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.