A Belgian Call-In Proposal: Joining the EU Trend, But Questions Remain

On April 17, 2025, the President of the Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) announced plans to introduce a national call-in power for merger control — a significant shift in Belgium’s approach to transactions under the thresholds of the European and national competition law. This development aligns Belgium with a broader European trend, where Member States like Italy, Ireland, and the Netherlands have already adopted or proposed similar tools to scrutinize mergers that may harm competition but fall below traditional notification thresholds. The move aims to address challenges posed by so-called “killer acquisitions” and “buy-and-build” strategies, particularly in innovation-driven sectors such as tech, pharma, and energy. Previously, Belgium relied on the Towercast doctrine to intervene in such cases, but its limited applicability and practical impact have prompted calls for reform. The initiative also reflects a growing need for national tools following the Illumina/Grail ruling, which limited the European Commission’s ability to accept referrals under Article 22 EUMR from national authorities lacking jurisdiction. Ultimately, the effectiveness of Belgium’s call-in system will depend on its legal design, including the clarity of its criteria, procedural safeguards, and its coherence with the EU’s merger control framework.

Publication Details

Journal
IntRechtDok
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17176/20250419-082157-0
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Belgian Call-In Proposal: Joining the EU Trend, But Questions Remain

IntRechtDok
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

A Belgian Call-In Proposal: Joining the EU Trend, But Questions Remain

article en

Abstract

On April 17, 2025, the President of the Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) announced plans to introduce a national call-in power for merger control — a significant shift in Belgium’s approach to transactions under the thresholds of the European and national competition law. This development aligns Belgium with a broader European trend, where Member States like Italy, Ireland, and the Netherlands have already adopted or proposed similar tools to scrutinize mergers that may harm competition but fall below traditional notification thresholds. The move aims to address challenges posed by so-called “killer acquisitions” and “buy-and-build” strategies, particularly in innovation-driven sectors such as tech, pharma, and energy. Previously, Belgium relied on the Towercast doctrine to intervene in such cases, but its limited applicability and practical impact have prompted calls for reform. The initiative also reflects a growing need for national tools following the Illumina/Grail ruling, which limited the European Commission’s ability to accept referrals under Article 22 EUMR from national authorities lacking jurisdiction. Ultimately, the effectiveness of Belgium’s call-in system will depend on its legal design, including the clarity of its criteria, procedural safeguards, and its coherence with the EU’s merger control framework.

IntRechtDok
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Belgian Call-In Proposal: Joining the EU Trend, But Questions Remain · IntRechtDok (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS