The Interchangeability of Disaster-Resilient and Coastal-Resilient Community Frameworks

Researchers frequently use frameworks developed for specific contexts interchangeably, raising a fundamental question about whether coastal communities require specialized resilience considerations. Using semi-structured interviews coastal planners, government guidance experts, and community resilience researchs, four interviews were conducted over Zoom with one excluded as an outlier. A systematic three-staged open coding process was used to refine 27 initial codes into 20 distinct codes. Most experts reflected that there were few differences between frameworks and their goal to promote collaboration. Subject responses varied on if there was a distinction between inland and coastal resilience. Although the value of coastal areas was recomfirmed by the experts interviewed and the literature. The experts interviewed assigned responsibility for adapting frameworks to local planners. 

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/42h9-xz64
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Interchangeability of Disaster-Resilient and Coastal-Resilient Community Frameworks

UNC Libraries
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

The Interchangeability of Disaster-Resilient and Coastal-Resilient Community Frameworks

article en

Abstract

Researchers frequently use frameworks developed for specific contexts interchangeably, raising a fundamental question about whether coastal communities require specialized resilience considerations. Using semi-structured interviews coastal planners, government guidance experts, and community resilience researchs, four interviews were conducted over Zoom with one excluded as an outlier. A systematic three-staged open coding process was used to refine 27 initial codes into 20 distinct codes. Most experts reflected that there were few differences between frameworks and their goal to promote collaboration. Subject responses varied on if there was a distinction between inland and coastal resilience. Although the value of coastal areas was recomfirmed by the experts interviewed and the literature. The experts interviewed assigned responsibility for adapting frameworks to local planners. 

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.