Integration of multi-criteria decision-making in heritage building information management

This paper proposes a theoretical framework that integrates Heritage Building Information Management (HBIM) with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques, to improve decision-making processes in the field of heritage conservation. The proposed framework employs the detailed semantic and geometric data provided by HBIM to evaluate and prioritize conservation strategies based on multiple criteria, including historical significance, architectural integrity, economic viability, social relevance, and environmental impact. The combination of both methodologies has the potential to not only technically improve heritage conservation but also facilitate informed and transparent decision-making processes by allowing stakeholder participation, balancing competing priorities, and achieving sustainable conservation outcomes. This study lays the foundation for a comprehensive, dynamic, and adaptive decision-making workflow that addresses the complicated challenges of heritage conservation.

Publication Details

Journal
tub.dok (Hamburg University of Technology)
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15480/882.13488
Primary Topic
Organizational Management and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of multi-criteria decision-making in heritage building information management

tub.dok (Hamburg University of Technology)
Organizational Management and Innovation
article

Integration of multi-criteria decision-making in heritage building information management

article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a theoretical framework that integrates Heritage Building Information Management (HBIM) with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques, to improve decision-making processes in the field of heritage conservation. The proposed framework employs the detailed semantic and geometric data provided by HBIM to evaluate and prioritize conservation strategies based on multiple criteria, including historical significance, architectural integrity, economic viability, social relevance, and environmental impact. The combination of both methodologies has the potential to not only technically improve heritage conservation but also facilitate informed and transparent decision-making processes by allowing stakeholder participation, balancing competing priorities, and achieving sustainable conservation outcomes. This study lays the foundation for a comprehensive, dynamic, and adaptive decision-making workflow that addresses the complicated challenges of heritage conservation.

tub.dok (Hamburg University of Technology)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Organizational Management and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.