Engaging Mafeje's ghost: Fort Hare and the virtues of 'Homeland' anthropology

In 2015, in the year preceding the centenary of South Africa���s oldest historically black university, the University of Fort Hare, the vice chancellor of the university, Dr. Mvuyo Tom, asked academics who were presenting inaugural lectures in that year to specifically reflect on their work and their disciplines in the light of the history of Fort Hare. In this article, which was first delivered as a lecture in May 2015, the author takes up the vice chancellor���s request by reflecting on the role and significance of Fort Hare in the history and practice of social anthropology in southern Africa and in the Eastern Cape in particular. He grounds his analysis in the critiques of the discipline that were initiated in southern Africa through the work of Archie Mafeje, an intellectual son of the Eastern Cape in the late 1960s and have recently been reproduced in various forms. To address this critique, he turns to the history of the discipline and its two main South African variants, social anthropology and volkekunde, and discuss the intellectual origins, content and focus of the former at the University of Fort Hare during the 1940s and 1950s. He will show that social anthropology was warmly and enthusiastically embraced by African scholars and leading liberation figures at the university at that time, who domesticated the discipline within their own concerns about African nationalism and identity. In the final part, I revisit the work of regional anthropologists in the Eastern Cape, including Monica Wilson, Philip Mayer, and others (including myself), to highlight the virtues of what I call a regional tradition of ���homeland anthropology���. I suggest this brand of anthropology still powerful and enduring insights one of the offers that help us understand the region and the country. My aim here is not to shield anthropology from its complex and compromised past, it is rather to make a case for the domestication of the discipline in a regional and African context by building on its own history as a discipline in Africa.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/29179322
Primary Topic
South African History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging Mafeje's ghost: Fort Hare and the virtues of 'Homeland' anthropology

Figshare
South African History and Culture
article

Engaging Mafeje's ghost: Fort Hare and the virtues of 'Homeland' anthropology

article en

Abstract

In 2015, in the year preceding the centenary of South Africa���s oldest historically black university, the University of Fort Hare, the vice chancellor of the university, Dr. Mvuyo Tom, asked academics who were presenting inaugural lectures in that year to specifically reflect on their work and their disciplines in the light of the history of Fort Hare. In this article, which was first delivered as a lecture in May 2015, the author takes up the vice chancellor���s request by reflecting on the role and significance of Fort Hare in the history and practice of social anthropology in southern Africa and in the Eastern Cape in particular. He grounds his analysis in the critiques of the discipline that were initiated in southern Africa through the work of Archie Mafeje, an intellectual son of the Eastern Cape in the late 1960s and have recently been reproduced in various forms. To address this critique, he turns to the history of the discipline and its two main South African variants, social anthropology and volkekunde, and discuss the intellectual origins, content and focus of the former at the University of Fort Hare during the 1940s and 1950s. He will show that social anthropology was warmly and enthusiastically embraced by African scholars and leading liberation figures at the university at that time, who domesticated the discipline within their own concerns about African nationalism and identity. In the final part, I revisit the work of regional anthropologists in the Eastern Cape, including Monica Wilson, Philip Mayer, and others (including myself), to highlight the virtues of what I call a regional tradition of ���homeland anthropology���. I suggest this brand of anthropology still powerful and enduring insights one of the offers that help us understand the region and the country. My aim here is not to shield anthropology from its complex and compromised past, it is rather to make a case for the domestication of the discipline in a regional and African context by building on its own history as a discipline in Africa.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
South African History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Engaging Mafeje's ghost: Fort Hare and the virtues of 'Homeland' anthropology · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS