Discussion guide.

<div><p>Background</p><p>Anti-racism is part of the medical professional ethos. Nevertheless, racism pervades medicine on individual, institutional, and structural levels. The concept of habitus helps to understand deficiencies in enacting anti-racism in practice. We use a habitus-based framework to analyse how medical students in Germany deal with the topic of racism. The research questions are: What are medical students’ understandings of racism? How do they deal with the topic in discussions? What difficulties do they face in such discussions?</p><p>Methods</p><p>In a qualitative-explorative research design, we conducted six online group discussions with 32 medical students from medical schools all over Germany. Data analysis combined qualitative methods from thematic qualitative content analysis and the documentary method.</p><p>Results</p><p>We identified five typical ways of dealing with the topic of racism in discussions. The first one (‘scientistic’) orientates action towards the idea of medicine as an objective science, justifies the use of racial categories as scientific, and defines racism based on intention. The second (‘pragmatic’) orientates action towards tacit rules of clinical practice, justifies the use of racialised categories as practical and defines racism as an interpersonal problem. The third (‘subjectivist’) lacks a clear orientation of action for dealing with the topic of racism and instead displays uncertainty and subjectivism in understanding racialised categorisations as well as racism. The fourth (‘interculturalist’) orientates action towards an ideal of intercultural exchange, understands racialised categorisations as representing cultural differences and interprets racism as prejudice against cultures. The fifth (‘critical’) orientates action towards sociological scholarship, understands racialised categorisations as social constructs and views racism as a structural problem.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The results presented help to understand preconditions of enacting anti-racism in medicine and point to difficulties and learning needs. The heterogenous ways of dealing with the topic require a differentiated approach in medical education.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313614.s001
Primary Topic
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion guide.

Figshare
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
article

Discussion guide.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Background</p><p>Anti-racism is part of the medical professional ethos. Nevertheless, racism pervades medicine on individual, institutional, and structural levels. The concept of habitus helps to understand deficiencies in enacting anti-racism in practice. We use a habitus-based framework to analyse how medical students in Germany deal with the topic of racism. The research questions are: What are medical students’ understandings of racism? How do they deal with the topic in discussions? What difficulties do they face in such discussions?</p><p>Methods</p><p>In a qualitative-explorative research design, we conducted six online group discussions with 32 medical students from medical schools all over Germany. Data analysis combined qualitative methods from thematic qualitative content analysis and the documentary method.</p><p>Results</p><p>We identified five typical ways of dealing with the topic of racism in discussions. The first one (‘scientistic’) orientates action towards the idea of medicine as an objective science, justifies the use of racial categories as scientific, and defines racism based on intention. The second (‘pragmatic’) orientates action towards tacit rules of clinical practice, justifies the use of racialised categories as practical and defines racism as an interpersonal problem. The third (‘subjectivist’) lacks a clear orientation of action for dealing with the topic of racism and instead displays uncertainty and subjectivism in understanding racialised categorisations as well as racism. The fourth (‘interculturalist’) orientates action towards an ideal of intercultural exchange, understands racialised categorisations as representing cultural differences and interprets racism as prejudice against cultures. The fifth (‘critical’) orientates action towards sociological scholarship, understands racialised categorisations as social constructs and views racism as a structural problem.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The results presented help to understand preconditions of enacting anti-racism in medicine and point to difficulties and learning needs. The heterogenous ways of dealing with the topic require a differentiated approach in medical education.</p></div>

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discussion guide. · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS