Sample size flowchart.

<div><p>This study aimed to estimate the trends in the body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of obesity among United States (U.S.) adolescents (10–19 years) and to examine the associations between sociodemographic factors and both BMI and obesity prevalence. The 2007–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally representative repeated cross-sectional survey data (n = 9,826) were used. Outcomes included: 1) Mean BMI and 2) obesity (yes/no; defined as BMI ≥95% percentile). Sociodemographic variables included age, sex, race/ethnicity, and poverty income ratio (PIR; low-income <1.3, middle-income ≥1.3 and <3.5, high-income ≥3.5). By accounting for the complex survey design, weighted generalized linear/Poisson models were used to conduct the analyses. Girls constituted 49% of the sample. From 2007–2008 to 2017–2020, there was an increase in BMI and obesity prevalence, particularly among Black and Hispanic adolescents, and those from low- and middle-income families. Additionally, there was an increase in obesity prevalence among both boys and girls. However, there were no significant changes in BMI and obesity prevalence in the other race and ethnic adolescents. Girls had a 12% (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio [APR] = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81–0.96) lower likelihood of being obese than boys. Compared to White adolescents, Black and Hispanic adolescents had 22% (APR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06–1.40) and 19% (APR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05–1.36) greater risk of being obese. Compared to high-income families, adolescents from low- and middle-income families had 62% (APR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.39–1.90) and 47% (APR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24–1.76) greater risk of being obese, respectively. The results indicated persistent disparities in obesity prevalence among different race/ethnic and sociodemographic groups. Future obesity intervention should address key disparities by targeting specific race/ethnic adolescents from low-income families and promoting health equality.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290211.s001
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sample size flowchart.

Figshare
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Sample size flowchart.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>This study aimed to estimate the trends in the body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of obesity among United States (U.S.) adolescents (10–19 years) and to examine the associations between sociodemographic factors and both BMI and obesity prevalence. The 2007–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally representative repeated cross-sectional survey data (n = 9,826) were used. Outcomes included: 1) Mean BMI and 2) obesity (yes/no; defined as BMI ≥95% percentile). Sociodemographic variables included age, sex, race/ethnicity, and poverty income ratio (PIR; low-income <1.3, middle-income ≥1.3 and <3.5, high-income ≥3.5). By accounting for the complex survey design, weighted generalized linear/Poisson models were used to conduct the analyses. Girls constituted 49% of the sample. From 2007–2008 to 2017–2020, there was an increase in BMI and obesity prevalence, particularly among Black and Hispanic adolescents, and those from low- and middle-income families. Additionally, there was an increase in obesity prevalence among both boys and girls. However, there were no significant changes in BMI and obesity prevalence in the other race and ethnic adolescents. Girls had a 12% (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio [APR] = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81–0.96) lower likelihood of being obese than boys. Compared to White adolescents, Black and Hispanic adolescents had 22% (APR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06–1.40) and 19% (APR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05–1.36) greater risk of being obese. Compared to high-income families, adolescents from low- and middle-income families had 62% (APR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.39–1.90) and 47% (APR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24–1.76) greater risk of being obese, respectively. The results indicated persistent disparities in obesity prevalence among different race/ethnic and sociodemographic groups. Future obesity intervention should address key disparities by targeting specific race/ethnic adolescents from low-income families and promoting health equality.</p></div>

Figshare
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.