S1-S15 Tables and S1 and S2 Figs.

<div><p>Introduction</p><p>Most studies on risk factors for a SARS-CoV-2 infection were conducted in the pre-vaccination era with many non-pharmaceutical prevention measures in place. We investigated risk factors for symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated persons in a period with a varying degree of prevention measures.</p><p>Methods</p><p>In a test-negative case control study among vaccinated adults attending community COVID-19 testing locations between June 1<sup>st</sup> 2021 till February 28<sup>th</sup> 2022, we compared symptomatic cases with symptomatic controls (to study risk factors specific for SARS-CoV-2) and with asymptomatic controls (to study risk factors that could apply to respiratory infections in general). We examined potential risk factors including household composition and mitigation behaviour by logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, and week of testing.</p><p>Results</p><p>Risk factors for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test when symptomatic cases were compared to symptomatic controls were: having a household size of more than 4 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.47; 95% CI 1.14–1.92), being a healthcare worker (1.27;1.18–1.47), and visiting busy locations outside (1.49;1.19–1.87). When symptomatic cases were compared to asymptomatic controls, a household size of more than 4 members (1.71;1.25–2.33), living with children aged 0–12 (1.59;1.12–2.26), visiting busy locations outside (1.64;1.24–2.17) were independent risk factors for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Risk factors for separate periods and waves differed from the study period as a whole.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>This study was conducted in a period with a varying degree of prevention measures. Among vaccinated individuals, we identified several SARS-CoV-2 specific risk factors and SARS-CoV-2 risk factors that could be more general for respiratory infections. For SARS-CoV-2 transmission more attention could be given to visiting busy outdoor locations, having a household size that consists of more than 4 persons, being a healthcare worker, and living with children aged 0–12. Risk factors varied with different phases in the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of repeated assessment of risk factors.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311229.s001
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1-S15 Tables and S1 and S2 Figs.

Figshare
Respiratory viral infections research
article

S1-S15 Tables and S1 and S2 Figs.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Introduction</p><p>Most studies on risk factors for a SARS-CoV-2 infection were conducted in the pre-vaccination era with many non-pharmaceutical prevention measures in place. We investigated risk factors for symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated persons in a period with a varying degree of prevention measures.</p><p>Methods</p><p>In a test-negative case control study among vaccinated adults attending community COVID-19 testing locations between June 1<sup>st</sup> 2021 till February 28<sup>th</sup> 2022, we compared symptomatic cases with symptomatic controls (to study risk factors specific for SARS-CoV-2) and with asymptomatic controls (to study risk factors that could apply to respiratory infections in general). We examined potential risk factors including household composition and mitigation behaviour by logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, and week of testing.</p><p>Results</p><p>Risk factors for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test when symptomatic cases were compared to symptomatic controls were: having a household size of more than 4 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.47; 95% CI 1.14–1.92), being a healthcare worker (1.27;1.18–1.47), and visiting busy locations outside (1.49;1.19–1.87). When symptomatic cases were compared to asymptomatic controls, a household size of more than 4 members (1.71;1.25–2.33), living with children aged 0–12 (1.59;1.12–2.26), visiting busy locations outside (1.64;1.24–2.17) were independent risk factors for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Risk factors for separate periods and waves differed from the study period as a whole.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>This study was conducted in a period with a varying degree of prevention measures. Among vaccinated individuals, we identified several SARS-CoV-2 specific risk factors and SARS-CoV-2 risk factors that could be more general for respiratory infections. For SARS-CoV-2 transmission more attention could be given to visiting busy outdoor locations, having a household size that consists of more than 4 persons, being a healthcare worker, and living with children aged 0–12. Risk factors varied with different phases in the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of repeated assessment of risk factors.</p></div>

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.