ANOVA outputs of weighted genome size (GS) models.

<p>Results of linear mixed-effects models fitting the effect of N and P fertilization on the change in cover-weighted GS, compared to control plots (ΔcwGS<sub>(control vs. treatment</sub>, <b>a, b</b>) and compared to pretreatment levels (ΔcwGS<sub>(pretreatment vs. treatment)</sub>, <b>c, d</b>) (<i>n</i> = 681). In addition, the summary table is presented for a model fitting the effects of nutrients, temperature, and precipitation on the log response ratio (LRR) of cover-weighted GS (ΔcwGS(<sub>control vs. treatment</sub>)). (<b>e</b>) Models in <b>a–d</b> were also repeated including only the species for which directly measured GS values exist, only on sites where they were sampled. (<b>f–i</b>) Significant differences are shown in bold and starred (* = <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05, ** = <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01, *** = <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001).</p> <p>(DOCX)</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002927.s002
Primary Topic
Educational Robotics and Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANOVA outputs of weighted genome size (GS) models.

Figshare
Educational Robotics and Engineering
article

ANOVA outputs of weighted genome size (GS) models.

article en

Abstract

<p>Results of linear mixed-effects models fitting the effect of N and P fertilization on the change in cover-weighted GS, compared to control plots (ΔcwGS<sub>(control vs. treatment</sub>, <b>a, b</b>) and compared to pretreatment levels (ΔcwGS<sub>(pretreatment vs. treatment)</sub>, <b>c, d</b>) (<i>n</i> = 681). In addition, the summary table is presented for a model fitting the effects of nutrients, temperature, and precipitation on the log response ratio (LRR) of cover-weighted GS (ΔcwGS(<sub>control vs. treatment</sub>)). (<b>e</b>) Models in <b>a–d</b> were also repeated including only the species for which directly measured GS values exist, only on sites where they were sampled. (<b>f–i</b>) Significant differences are shown in bold and starred (* = <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05, ** = <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01, *** = <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001).</p> <p>(DOCX)</p>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Educational Robotics and Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.