Solaris for Lem and Tarkovsky. Novel and film between the impossibility of progress and the abyss of the past

In 1961 the Polish writer Stanislaw Lem realized Solaris, one of his best known and most appreciated works. Describing the encounter with an indecipherable planet-ocean, Lem highlights the impossibility of truly communicating with the Other and brings out the aporias and complexities of positivist thinking. Eleven years later, Andrey Tarkovsky adapts Lem’s subject for cinema. In the homonymous movie, though, the Russian director imprints his own peculiar conception of time and history: the Tarkovskian ocean becomes a source of connection with a past seen as the only hold for the present, a crystal in which, however, the actual seems to succumb to the virtual. Lem’s peculiar conception of progress is here put in contrast against the personal and humanistic nostalgia of the Russian director. The aim of the text consists in this comparison: two divergent philosophies of time expressed by two authors through their respective work.

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Torino
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/11182
Primary Topic
European Cultural and National Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solaris for Lem and Tarkovsky. Novel and film between the impossibility of progress and the abyss of the past

Università degli Studi di Torino
European Cultural and National Identity
article

Solaris for Lem and Tarkovsky. Novel and film between the impossibility of progress and the abyss of the past

article en

Abstract

In 1961 the Polish writer Stanislaw Lem realized Solaris, one of his best known and most appreciated works. Describing the encounter with an indecipherable planet-ocean, Lem highlights the impossibility of truly communicating with the Other and brings out the aporias and complexities of positivist thinking. Eleven years later, Andrey Tarkovsky adapts Lem’s subject for cinema. In the homonymous movie, though, the Russian director imprints his own peculiar conception of time and history: the Tarkovskian ocean becomes a source of connection with a past seen as the only hold for the present, a crystal in which, however, the actual seems to succumb to the virtual. Lem’s peculiar conception of progress is here put in contrast against the personal and humanistic nostalgia of the Russian director. The aim of the text consists in this comparison: two divergent philosophies of time expressed by two authors through their respective work.

Università degli Studi di Torino
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
European Cultural and National Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.