The user experience of voice assistants in retailing: a qualitative comparative study

Purpose – This study aims to examine the user experience of voice assistants (VAs) in different retailing contexts by highlighting factors that impact the effectiveness of voice commerce services. Design/methodology/approach – This study follows a qualitative research method using 30 in-depth semi-structured interviews with online shoppers (15 users of VAs from Nigeria and 15 from the UK). Following Gioia’s methodology and automated content analysis using LexiPortal, this paper examined users’ motivations for adopting VAs, their challenges and how VAs might influence customers’ brand trust and loyalty. Findings – This paper found that anthropomorphism, convenience, companionship and literacy support drove shoppers’ adoption of VAs. Technophobia, audio bias, audio disparity and data security emerged as challenges facing VA users. In addition, the Nigerian participants also highlighted unreliable power supply. Despite these challenges, the participants have developed trust and personal attachment to their VAs. Originality/value – This study is one of the few academic works to specifically analyse how retail experiences are shaped through VAs in a comparative setting of British and Nigerian VA users. The findings enrich the extant literature on user experience of VAs with a granular focus on customer motivations as well as challenges.

Publication Details

Journal
Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qmr-08-2024-0171/full/html7
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The user experience of voice assistants in retailing: a qualitative comparative study

Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)
AI in Service Interactions
article

The user experience of voice assistants in retailing: a qualitative comparative study

article en

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to examine the user experience of voice assistants (VAs) in different retailing contexts by highlighting factors that impact the effectiveness of voice commerce services. Design/methodology/approach – This study follows a qualitative research method using 30 in-depth semi-structured interviews with online shoppers (15 users of VAs from Nigeria and 15 from the UK). Following Gioia’s methodology and automated content analysis using LexiPortal, this paper examined users’ motivations for adopting VAs, their challenges and how VAs might influence customers’ brand trust and loyalty. Findings – This paper found that anthropomorphism, convenience, companionship and literacy support drove shoppers’ adoption of VAs. Technophobia, audio bias, audio disparity and data security emerged as challenges facing VA users. In addition, the Nigerian participants also highlighted unreliable power supply. Despite these challenges, the participants have developed trust and personal attachment to their VAs. Originality/value – This study is one of the few academic works to specifically analyse how retail experiences are shaped through VAs in a comparative setting of British and Nigerian VA users. The findings enrich the extant literature on user experience of VAs with a granular focus on customer motivations as well as challenges.

Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The user experience of voice assistants in retailing: a qualitative comparative study · Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS