Testing the asteroseismic estimates of stellar radii with surface brightness-colour relations and

Aims. We compared stellar radii derived from asteroseismic scaling relations with those estimated using two independent surface brightness-colour relations (SBCRs) combined with Gaia DR3 parallaxes. Methods. We cross-matched asteroseismic and astrometric data for over 6400 red giant branch (RGB) and red clump (RC) stars from the APO-K2 catalogue with the TESS Input Catalogue v8.2 to obtain precise V band magnitudes and E(B − V) colour excesses. We then adopted two different SBCRs from the literature to derive stellar radius estimates, denoted as Ra and Rb, respectively. We analysed the ratio of these SBCR-derived radii to the asteroseismic radius estimates, R, provided in the APO-K2 catalogue. Results. Both SBCRs exhibited good agreement with asteroseismic radius estimates. On average, Ra was overestimated by 1.2% with respect to R, while Rb was underestimated by 2.5%. For stars larger than 20 R⊙, SBCR radii are systematically lower than asteroseismic ones. The dispersion in the radius ratio was similar for the two methods (around 10%). The agreement with asteroseismic radii shows a strong dependence on the parallax. The dispersion is halved for stars with a parallax greater than 2.5 mas. In this subsample, Rb showed perfect agreement with R, while Ra remained slightly overestimated, by 3%. A trend with [Fe/H] was found at a level of 4% to 6% per dex. Additionally, a clear trend with asteroseismic mass is found. For stars less massive than about 0.95 M⊙, SBCR radii were significantly higher than asteroseismic ones, by about 6%. This overestimation correlated with the presence of extended helium cores in these stars’ structures relative to their envelopes. Furthermore, radius ratios showed a dichotomous behaviour at higher masses, mainly due to the presence of several RC stars with SBCR radii significantly lower with respect to asteroseismology. This behaviour originates from a different response of asteroseismic scaling relations and SBCR to [α/Fe] abundance ratios for massive stars, both in RGB and RC phases, which is reported here for the first time.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451473/pdf
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the asteroseismic estimates of stellar radii with surface brightness-colour relations and

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Testing the asteroseismic estimates of stellar radii with surface brightness-colour relations and

article en

Abstract

Aims. We compared stellar radii derived from asteroseismic scaling relations with those estimated using two independent surface brightness-colour relations (SBCRs) combined with Gaia DR3 parallaxes. Methods. We cross-matched asteroseismic and astrometric data for over 6400 red giant branch (RGB) and red clump (RC) stars from the APO-K2 catalogue with the TESS Input Catalogue v8.2 to obtain precise V band magnitudes and E(B − V) colour excesses. We then adopted two different SBCRs from the literature to derive stellar radius estimates, denoted as Ra and Rb, respectively. We analysed the ratio of these SBCR-derived radii to the asteroseismic radius estimates, R, provided in the APO-K2 catalogue. Results. Both SBCRs exhibited good agreement with asteroseismic radius estimates. On average, Ra was overestimated by 1.2% with respect to R, while Rb was underestimated by 2.5%. For stars larger than 20 R⊙, SBCR radii are systematically lower than asteroseismic ones. The dispersion in the radius ratio was similar for the two methods (around 10%). The agreement with asteroseismic radii shows a strong dependence on the parallax. The dispersion is halved for stars with a parallax greater than 2.5 mas. In this subsample, Rb showed perfect agreement with R, while Ra remained slightly overestimated, by 3%. A trend with [Fe/H] was found at a level of 4% to 6% per dex. Additionally, a clear trend with asteroseismic mass is found. For stars less massive than about 0.95 M⊙, SBCR radii were significantly higher than asteroseismic ones, by about 6%. This overestimation correlated with the presence of extended helium cores in these stars’ structures relative to their envelopes. Furthermore, radius ratios showed a dichotomous behaviour at higher masses, mainly due to the presence of several RC stars with SBCR radii significantly lower with respect to asteroseismology. This behaviour originates from a different response of asteroseismic scaling relations and SBCR to [α/Fe] abundance ratios for massive stars, both in RGB and RC phases, which is reported here for the first time.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.