Advocating Qualitative Studies in Territory of General Practice

Background General practice research in China needs to further explore the path for breaking through the bottleneck of the discipline development from the perspective of philosophy and methodology. Objective By comparing and analyzing qualitative research articles published in benchmark journals, strategies for further advocating qualitative research in general practice medicine in China are proposed. Methods Based on a brief analysis of the categories and topics research articles published in the British Journal of General Practice, the author reflects on the current relevant publications and challenges of qualitative research in medical discipline and proposes strategies to promote qualitative research in general practice. Results Qualitative research in the British Journal of General Practice accounts for 38% (41/107) of research articles in 2024. The people-centred orientation of general practice encourages researchers to explore experiences, views, perceptions and opinions of patients, laypersons, doctors, nurses, and stakeholders, to plan and provide primary care that with humanity, responsiveness, and participatory. Social science methodologists and academic general practitioners who are interested in sociological research methods are the main driving force for the application of qualitative research in the field of general practice. The tradition of biomedicine philosophy with positivism is a disciplinary barrier that medical-trained need to overcome when conducting qualitative research. Academic general practitioners must understand the difference between ontology and epistemology, and acknowledge and try the interpretivist way of thinking. Different from qualitative data collection and coding techniques that are relatively easy to learn, during the training and learning process of qualitative research, special attention should be paid to breaking through the inertia of thinking and using interpretivism as another window to understand the world and primary care. Conclusion Qualitative research is an important area for the development of general practice disciplines. Better quality qualitative research first depends on the enrichment of philosophical thoughts and then use the tools and tactics to realize another understanding of the world.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-957.2024.a0027
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advocating Qualitative Studies in Territory of General Practice

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Advocating Qualitative Studies in Territory of General Practice

article en

Abstract

Background General practice research in China needs to further explore the path for breaking through the bottleneck of the discipline development from the perspective of philosophy and methodology. Objective By comparing and analyzing qualitative research articles published in benchmark journals, strategies for further advocating qualitative research in general practice medicine in China are proposed. Methods Based on a brief analysis of the categories and topics research articles published in the British Journal of General Practice, the author reflects on the current relevant publications and challenges of qualitative research in medical discipline and proposes strategies to promote qualitative research in general practice. Results Qualitative research in the British Journal of General Practice accounts for 38% (41/107) of research articles in 2024. The people-centred orientation of general practice encourages researchers to explore experiences, views, perceptions and opinions of patients, laypersons, doctors, nurses, and stakeholders, to plan and provide primary care that with humanity, responsiveness, and participatory. Social science methodologists and academic general practitioners who are interested in sociological research methods are the main driving force for the application of qualitative research in the field of general practice. The tradition of biomedicine philosophy with positivism is a disciplinary barrier that medical-trained need to overcome when conducting qualitative research. Academic general practitioners must understand the difference between ontology and epistemology, and acknowledge and try the interpretivist way of thinking. Different from qualitative data collection and coding techniques that are relatively easy to learn, during the training and learning process of qualitative research, special attention should be paid to breaking through the inertia of thinking and using interpretivism as another window to understand the world and primary care. Conclusion Qualitative research is an important area for the development of general practice disciplines. Better quality qualitative research first depends on the enrichment of philosophical thoughts and then use the tools and tactics to realize another understanding of the world.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.