Benchmarking\nReconstructive Spectrometer with Multiresonant\nCavities

Recent years have seen the rapid development of miniaturized\nreconstructive\nspectrometers (RSs), yet they still confront a range of technical\nchallenges, such as bandwidth/resolution ratio, sensing speed, and/or\npower efficiency. Reported RS designs often suffer from insufficient\ndecorrelation between sampling channels, which, in essence, is due\nto inadequate engineering of sampling responses. This in turn results\nin poor spectral-pixel-to-channel ratios (SPCRs), typically restricted\nat single digits. So far, there lacks a general guideline for manipulating\nRS sampling responses for the effectiveness of spectral information\nacquisition. In this study, we shed light on a fundamental parameter\nfrom the compressive sensing (CS) theorythe average mutual\ncorrelation coefficient <i>ν</i>and provide\ninsight into how it serves as a critical benchmark in RS design. To\nthis end, we propose a novel RS design with multiresonant cavities,\nconsisting of a series of partial reflective interfaces. Such multicavity\nconfiguration allows the superlative optimization of sampling matrices\nto achieve minimized <i>ν</i>. Experimentally, we\nimplement a single-shot, dual-band RS on a SiN platform, realizing\nan overall operation bandwidth of 270 nm and a <0.5 nm resolution\nwith only 15 sampling channels per band. This leads to a record high\nSPCR of 18.0. Moreover, the proposed multicavity design can be readily\nadapted to various photonic platforms, ranging from optical fibers\nto free-space optics. For instance, we showcase that by employing\nmultilayer coatings, an ultrabroadband RS can be optimized to exhibit\na 700 nm bandwidth with an SPCR of over 100.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.4c00915.s001
Primary Topic
Photonic and Optical Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking\nReconstructive Spectrometer with Multiresonant\nCavities

Figshare
Photonic and Optical Devices
article

Benchmarking\nReconstructive Spectrometer with Multiresonant\nCavities

article en

Abstract

Recent years have seen the rapid development of miniaturized\nreconstructive\nspectrometers (RSs), yet they still confront a range of technical\nchallenges, such as bandwidth/resolution ratio, sensing speed, and/or\npower efficiency. Reported RS designs often suffer from insufficient\ndecorrelation between sampling channels, which, in essence, is due\nto inadequate engineering of sampling responses. This in turn results\nin poor spectral-pixel-to-channel ratios (SPCRs), typically restricted\nat single digits. So far, there lacks a general guideline for manipulating\nRS sampling responses for the effectiveness of spectral information\nacquisition. In this study, we shed light on a fundamental parameter\nfrom the compressive sensing (CS) theorythe average mutual\ncorrelation coefficient <i>ν</i>and provide\ninsight into how it serves as a critical benchmark in RS design. To\nthis end, we propose a novel RS design with multiresonant cavities,\nconsisting of a series of partial reflective interfaces. Such multicavity\nconfiguration allows the superlative optimization of sampling matrices\nto achieve minimized <i>ν</i>. Experimentally, we\nimplement a single-shot, dual-band RS on a SiN platform, realizing\nan overall operation bandwidth of 270 nm and a <0.5 nm resolution\nwith only 15 sampling channels per band. This leads to a record high\nSPCR of 18.0. Moreover, the proposed multicavity design can be readily\nadapted to various photonic platforms, ranging from optical fibers\nto free-space optics. For instance, we showcase that by employing\nmultilayer coatings, an ultrabroadband RS can be optimized to exhibit\na 700 nm bandwidth with an SPCR of over 100.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Photonic and Optical Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.