Starch and Protein\nCharacteristics of Chestnut Flours\nand Their Applications in Gluten-Free Products

In the context of valorizing underutilized crops, this\nstudy investigated\nthe starch and protein characteristics of chestnut varieties (Balestrera\nand Rossera) and their potential for use at 15% and 25% in reformulating\ngluten-free baked snacks and fresh pasta. Chestnut varieties differ\nin protein and starch content (Balestrera > Rossera), as well as\nin\namylose, dietary fiber, and lipids (Balestrera < Rossera). Differences\nin starch and amylose content affected starch gelatinization (Balestrera\n< Rossera), pasting and retrogradation properties, and water absorption\ncapacity at 90 °C (Balestrera > Rossera). No differences in\nwater\nand oil absorption capacity and mixing properties were observed, neither\nin the protein profile nor in the nature of protein aggregates. Both\nvarieties exhibited a good aptitude for producing gluten-free baked\nsnacks and fresh pasta, even at enrichment levels of 25%. Overall,\nthis study could provide valuable information for the development\nof gluten-free products using sustainable, underutilized crops.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c07201.s001
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Starch and Protein\nCharacteristics of Chestnut Flours\nand Their Applications in Gluten-Free Products

Figshare
Food composition and properties
article

Starch and Protein\nCharacteristics of Chestnut Flours\nand Their Applications in Gluten-Free Products

article en

Abstract

In the context of valorizing underutilized crops, this\nstudy investigated\nthe starch and protein characteristics of chestnut varieties (Balestrera\nand Rossera) and their potential for use at 15% and 25% in reformulating\ngluten-free baked snacks and fresh pasta. Chestnut varieties differ\nin protein and starch content (Balestrera > Rossera), as well as\nin\namylose, dietary fiber, and lipids (Balestrera < Rossera). Differences\nin starch and amylose content affected starch gelatinization (Balestrera\n< Rossera), pasting and retrogradation properties, and water absorption\ncapacity at 90 °C (Balestrera > Rossera). No differences in\nwater\nand oil absorption capacity and mixing properties were observed, neither\nin the protein profile nor in the nature of protein aggregates. Both\nvarieties exhibited a good aptitude for producing gluten-free baked\nsnacks and fresh pasta, even at enrichment levels of 25%. Overall,\nthis study could provide valuable information for the development\nof gluten-free products using sustainable, underutilized crops.

Figshare
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Starch and Protein\nCharacteristics of Chestnut Flours\nand Their Applications in Gluten-Free Products · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS