3D Printed Limestone\nMonoliths for CO<sub>2</sub> Capture\nin Calcium Looping

In this experiment, limestone monoliths were 3D printed\nusing a\nnovel limestone mixture, then tested inside of a fixed bed reactor.\nThis represents to the author’s knowledge the first use of\n3D printed monoliths in calcium looping. Four monoliths with different\ninfill geometries were tested and compared against a random packing\nand limestone powder. Comparison was made through the adsorptive capacity\nof CO<sub>2</sub>, and the pressure drop across the column. Calcination\nwas done at 850 °C, under pure N<sub>2</sub>, whereas carbonation\nwas conducted at 650 °C with 15% CO<sub>2</sub>, balance N<sub>2</sub>. The adsorptive performance of these monoliths was in line\nwith the traditional limestone powder on a millimole CO<sub>2</sub>/g<sub>sorbent</sub> basis, but the pressure drop across the column\nwas reduced by ∼58% on average.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03232.s001
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D Printed Limestone\nMonoliths for CO2 Capture\nin Calcium Looping

Figshare
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
article

3D Printed Limestone\nMonoliths for CO2 Capture\nin Calcium Looping

article en

Abstract

In this experiment, limestone monoliths were 3D printed\nusing a\nnovel limestone mixture, then tested inside of a fixed bed reactor.\nThis represents to the author’s knowledge the first use of\n3D printed monoliths in calcium looping. Four monoliths with different\ninfill geometries were tested and compared against a random packing\nand limestone powder. Comparison was made through the adsorptive capacity\nof CO<sub>2</sub>, and the pressure drop across the column. Calcination\nwas done at 850 °C, under pure N<sub>2</sub>, whereas carbonation\nwas conducted at 650 °C with 15% CO<sub>2</sub>, balance N<sub>2</sub>. The adsorptive performance of these monoliths was in line\nwith the traditional limestone powder on a millimole CO<sub>2</sub>/g<sub>sorbent</sub> basis, but the pressure drop across the column\nwas reduced by ∼58% on average.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.