Methods for Calculating the Resistance of Grounding Devices with Backfilling Special Compositions

\nTraditional analytical methods for calculating and designing of grounding devices (GDs) in heterogeneous soils can lead to results that do not correspond to those obtained in practice. The empirical coefficients used in calculations of grounding systems given in various literature sources do not always give an explicable and significant discrepancy with the same initial data. In this paper, some well-known methods for calculating the spreading resistance of GDs are considered and the obtained results are compared with experimental data. It is shown that the recommendations and algorithms for calculating the resistance of GDs, presented in the well-known reference literature and regulatory documentation, do not give full and correct description for grounding devices installed in heterogeneous soil. In particular, it is shown that such a factor as the proportional ratio of soils with different resistivity practically does not affect the final result. This fact may mislead specialists, since the results obtained may differ significantly from what is observed in practice after the installation of GDs. The study proposes a calculation method and shows a fairly good convergence of the results with experimental data, and defines a further direction in optimizing calculation methods GDs.\n

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458401027/pdf
Primary Topic
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for Calculating the Resistance of Grounding Devices with Backfilling Special Compositions

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
article

Methods for Calculating the Resistance of Grounding Devices with Backfilling Special Compositions

article en

Abstract

\nTraditional analytical methods for calculating and designing of grounding devices (GDs) in heterogeneous soils can lead to results that do not correspond to those obtained in practice. The empirical coefficients used in calculations of grounding systems given in various literature sources do not always give an explicable and significant discrepancy with the same initial data. In this paper, some well-known methods for calculating the spreading resistance of GDs are considered and the obtained results are compared with experimental data. It is shown that the recommendations and algorithms for calculating the resistance of GDs, presented in the well-known reference literature and regulatory documentation, do not give full and correct description for grounding devices installed in heterogeneous soil. In particular, it is shown that such a factor as the proportional ratio of soils with different resistivity practically does not affect the final result. This fact may mislead specialists, since the results obtained may differ significantly from what is observed in practice after the installation of GDs. The study proposes a calculation method and shows a fairly good convergence of the results with experimental data, and defines a further direction in optimizing calculation methods GDs.\n

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methods for Calculating the Resistance of Grounding Devices with Backfilling Special Compositions · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS