Engineered\nBlended Thermoactivated Recycled Cement:\nA Study on Reactivity, Water Demand, Strength-Porosity, and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions

Annually, 1 Gt of cement waste is produced, constituting\none-fourth\nof recent cement production and surpassing the availability of most\nsupplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). It is known that the\nthermoactivation of cement waste (heating to 500 °C to drive\noff water molecules and hydroxyl units) recovers cement reactivity.\nHowever, from literature we show that this reactivity is insufficient\nfor adequate strength gain due to the high surface area and, hence,\nhigh water demand of thermoactivated recycled cement (RC). Instead,\nas proposed herein, RC used as the dominant component (>75% wt)\nwithin\nan optimized particle packing system (<20% wt of micronized Portland\ncement) yields an engineered recycled cement (eRC) with comparable\nearly- and late-age strength gain behavior to ordinary Portland cement\n(OPC). Evaluation of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reveals that eRC emits\n198–320 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/t, which is substantially lower than\nthat of scalable blended Portland cements. Deploying this technology\ntogether with other strategies, such as CO<sub>2</sub> capture by\ncarbonation of cement waste, can mitigate 61% of projected 2050 CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the cement industry (2.31 Gt of CO<sub>2</sub>/year).

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06567.s002
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineered\nBlended Thermoactivated Recycled Cement:\nA Study on Reactivity, Water Demand, Strength-Porosity, and CO2 Emissions

Figshare
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Engineered\nBlended Thermoactivated Recycled Cement:\nA Study on Reactivity, Water Demand, Strength-Porosity, and CO2 Emissions

article en

Abstract

Annually, 1 Gt of cement waste is produced, constituting\none-fourth\nof recent cement production and surpassing the availability of most\nsupplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). It is known that the\nthermoactivation of cement waste (heating to 500 °C to drive\noff water molecules and hydroxyl units) recovers cement reactivity.\nHowever, from literature we show that this reactivity is insufficient\nfor adequate strength gain due to the high surface area and, hence,\nhigh water demand of thermoactivated recycled cement (RC). Instead,\nas proposed herein, RC used as the dominant component (>75% wt)\nwithin\nan optimized particle packing system (<20% wt of micronized Portland\ncement) yields an engineered recycled cement (eRC) with comparable\nearly- and late-age strength gain behavior to ordinary Portland cement\n(OPC). Evaluation of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reveals that eRC emits\n198–320 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/t, which is substantially lower than\nthat of scalable blended Portland cements. Deploying this technology\ntogether with other strategies, such as CO<sub>2</sub> capture by\ncarbonation of cement waste, can mitigate 61% of projected 2050 CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the cement industry (2.31 Gt of CO<sub>2</sub>/year).

Figshare
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Engineered\nBlended Thermoactivated Recycled Cement:\nA Study on Reactivity, Water Demand, Strength-Porosity, and CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS