Predicting Cytotoxicity\nof Nanoparticles: A Meta-Analysis\nUsing Machine Learning

Cytotoxicity evaluation of nanoparticles\n(NPs) is regarded as a\ncrucial step for their successful application in the biomedical industry.\nHowever, conventional experimental methodologies for cytotoxicity\nmeasurements are often expensive, time-consuming, and demand intense\ntraining in cell culture. In this study, we developed generalized\nmachine learning (ML) models for both qualitative and quantitative\nprediction of cytotoxicity across a wide variety of NPs. In particular,\na meta-analysis of cytotoxicity data was conducted from published\nliterature on metallic, metal oxide, polymer, and carbon-based NPs,\nleading to the development of random forest-based regression and classification\nmodels for predicting cell viability from physicochemical properties\nof NPs, cellular attributes, and testing conditions. Our feature importance\nanalysis showed that accurately predicting the cytotoxicity of NPs\nusing the regression model requires knowledge of their composition,\nconcentration, zeta potential, and size, as well as exposure time,\ntoxicity assay, and tissue type. Interestingly, among these attributes,\nthe information about composition of NPs or tissue type was not needed\nfor achieving high accuracy in the qualitative prediction of cytotoxicity\nusing the classification model, indicating its superior robustness\ncompared to the regression model. These findings may encourage future\nresearchers to employ ML models more effectively and frequently to\nreliably assess the safety of NPs.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c02269.s003
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Cytotoxicity\nof Nanoparticles: A Meta-Analysis\nUsing Machine Learning

Figshare
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Predicting Cytotoxicity\nof Nanoparticles: A Meta-Analysis\nUsing Machine Learning

article en

Abstract

Cytotoxicity evaluation of nanoparticles\n(NPs) is regarded as a\ncrucial step for their successful application in the biomedical industry.\nHowever, conventional experimental methodologies for cytotoxicity\nmeasurements are often expensive, time-consuming, and demand intense\ntraining in cell culture. In this study, we developed generalized\nmachine learning (ML) models for both qualitative and quantitative\nprediction of cytotoxicity across a wide variety of NPs. In particular,\na meta-analysis of cytotoxicity data was conducted from published\nliterature on metallic, metal oxide, polymer, and carbon-based NPs,\nleading to the development of random forest-based regression and classification\nmodels for predicting cell viability from physicochemical properties\nof NPs, cellular attributes, and testing conditions. Our feature importance\nanalysis showed that accurately predicting the cytotoxicity of NPs\nusing the regression model requires knowledge of their composition,\nconcentration, zeta potential, and size, as well as exposure time,\ntoxicity assay, and tissue type. Interestingly, among these attributes,\nthe information about composition of NPs or tissue type was not needed\nfor achieving high accuracy in the qualitative prediction of cytotoxicity\nusing the classification model, indicating its superior robustness\ncompared to the regression model. These findings may encourage future\nresearchers to employ ML models more effectively and frequently to\nreliably assess the safety of NPs.

Figshare
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.