Spider Webs as Passive Monitors of Microplastic and\nIts Copollutants in Indoor Environments

Indoor environments\nare particularly vulnerable to microplastics\n(MPs) and associated copollutants due to limited air circulation and\nparticulate matter accumulation. Continuous monitoring is essential\nto evaluate exposure levels and health risks. We propose using indoor\nspider webs as passive monitors for MPs and their copollutants. MPs\nwere found in both web and dust samples with nonuniform distribution\n(<i>p</i> < 0.05), indicating contamination hotspots.\nWeb samples had significantly higher MP levels (138–33,570\nMPs/g) compared to dust samples (59–9324 MPs/g). A strong positive\ncorrelation (<i>r</i> = 0.93, <i>p</i> < 0.05)\nbetween MPs in dust and webs suggests that spider webs are effective\nbioindicators of indoor MP contamination. The study also revealed\nthe presence of Bisphenol A and various phthalic acid esters (PAEs).\nCo-pollutant concentrations\nranged from 52.02–1971.78 μg/kg in webs and 43.18–518.42\nμg/kg in dust. Diethyl phthalate (DEP) was more common in webs,\nwhile Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) predominated in dust. These findings\nhighlight spider webs’ potential as both effective biomonitoring\ntools and significant sinks for MPs and their cocontaminants in indoor\nenvironments.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c07373.s001
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spider Webs as Passive Monitors of Microplastic and\nIts Copollutants in Indoor Environments

Figshare
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Spider Webs as Passive Monitors of Microplastic and\nIts Copollutants in Indoor Environments

article en

Abstract

Indoor environments\nare particularly vulnerable to microplastics\n(MPs) and associated copollutants due to limited air circulation and\nparticulate matter accumulation. Continuous monitoring is essential\nto evaluate exposure levels and health risks. We propose using indoor\nspider webs as passive monitors for MPs and their copollutants. MPs\nwere found in both web and dust samples with nonuniform distribution\n(<i>p</i> < 0.05), indicating contamination hotspots.\nWeb samples had significantly higher MP levels (138–33,570\nMPs/g) compared to dust samples (59–9324 MPs/g). A strong positive\ncorrelation (<i>r</i> = 0.93, <i>p</i> < 0.05)\nbetween MPs in dust and webs suggests that spider webs are effective\nbioindicators of indoor MP contamination. The study also revealed\nthe presence of Bisphenol A and various phthalic acid esters (PAEs).\nCo-pollutant concentrations\nranged from 52.02–1971.78 μg/kg in webs and 43.18–518.42\nμg/kg in dust. Diethyl phthalate (DEP) was more common in webs,\nwhile Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) predominated in dust. These findings\nhighlight spider webs’ potential as both effective biomonitoring\ntools and significant sinks for MPs and their cocontaminants in indoor\nenvironments.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.