CoordinationCompetition Strategy for ConstructingHigh-Energy Photosensitive Complexes

High-dimensional energetic coordination compounds (ECCs) exhibit high stability and low sensitivity owing to their complex network structure, making them valuable in functional energetic materials such as combustion catalysis and insensitive detonating explosives. Four ECCs, [Co(DNBT)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]<i><sub>n</sub></i> (ECC-1), [Ni(DNBT)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>] (ECC-2), [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>MeOH] (ECC-3), and [Zn(DNBT)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>] (ECC-4), were synthesized by modifying the metal centers and using 5,5′-dinitro-4<i>H</i>,4’<i>H</i>-3,3′-bi(1,2,4-triazole) (DNBT) as ligands. After changing the solution environment and adding the auxiliary ligand 4<i>H</i>-1,2,4-triazol-4-amine (4-ATr), we obtained three ECCs with similar coordination structures once again: [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (ECC-5), [Ni<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (ECC-6), and [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>] (ECC-7). ECCs with fewer water molecules were chosen for laser ignition and detonation tests to evaluate their laser-induced ignition and detonation capabilities, indicating potential applications as laser initiators. The laser response behavior differs between [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] and [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>]. [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>] exhibits excellent laser response, with a low minimum laser initiation energy of 11 mJ and a short lengthy ignition delay of 2.31 ms, whereas [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] is less sensitive under the same conditions. Theoretical calculations and tests at different laser power densities indicate that [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] possesses more efficient photothermal conversion. This reduced sensitivity to laser response may stem from the presence of water. The charge transfer behavior between these compounds is thoroughly analyzed through theoretical and structural studies.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c04650.s001
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CoordinationCompetition Strategy for ConstructingHigh-Energy Photosensitive Complexes

Figshare
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

CoordinationCompetition Strategy for ConstructingHigh-Energy Photosensitive Complexes

article en

Abstract

High-dimensional energetic coordination compounds (ECCs) exhibit high stability and low sensitivity owing to their complex network structure, making them valuable in functional energetic materials such as combustion catalysis and insensitive detonating explosives. Four ECCs, [Co(DNBT)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>]<i><sub>n</sub></i> (ECC-1), [Ni(DNBT)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>] (ECC-2), [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>MeOH] (ECC-3), and [Zn(DNBT)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>] (ECC-4), were synthesized by modifying the metal centers and using 5,5′-dinitro-4<i>H</i>,4’<i>H</i>-3,3′-bi(1,2,4-triazole) (DNBT) as ligands. After changing the solution environment and adding the auxiliary ligand 4<i>H</i>-1,2,4-triazol-4-amine (4-ATr), we obtained three ECCs with similar coordination structures once again: [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (ECC-5), [Ni<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] (ECC-6), and [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>] (ECC-7). ECCs with fewer water molecules were chosen for laser ignition and detonation tests to evaluate their laser-induced ignition and detonation capabilities, indicating potential applications as laser initiators. The laser response behavior differs between [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] and [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>]. [Cu<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>] exhibits excellent laser response, with a low minimum laser initiation energy of 11 mJ and a short lengthy ignition delay of 2.31 ms, whereas [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] is less sensitive under the same conditions. Theoretical calculations and tests at different laser power densities indicate that [Co<sub>2</sub>(DNBT)<sub>2</sub>(4-ATr)<sub>3</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] possesses more efficient photothermal conversion. This reduced sensitivity to laser response may stem from the presence of water. The charge transfer behavior between these compounds is thoroughly analyzed through theoretical and structural studies.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.