Reference CC3 Excitation\nEnergies for Organic Chromophores:\nBenchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/<i>GW</i>, and Wave Function Methods

To expand the QUEST database of highly accurate vertical\ntransition\nenergies, we consider a series of large organic chromogens ubiquitous\nin dye chemistry, such as anthraquinone, azobenzene, BODIPY, and naphthalimide.\nWe compute, at the CC3 level of theory, the singlet and triplet vertical\ntransition energies associated with the low-lying excited states.\nThis leads to a collection of more than 120 new highly accurate excitation\nenergies. For several singlet transitions, we have been able to determine\nCCSDT transition energies with a compact basis set, finding minimal\ndeviations from the CC3 values for most states. Subsequently, we employ\nthese reference values to benchmark a series of lower-order wave function\napproaches, including the popular ADC(2) and CC2 schemes, as well\nas time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT), both with and\nwithout applying the Tamm–Dancoff approximation (TDA). At the\nTD-DFT level, we evaluate a large panel of global, range-separated,\nlocal, and double hybrid functionals. Additionally, we assess the\nperformance of the Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism\nrelying on both <i>G</i><sub>0</sub><i>W</i><sub>0</sub> and ev<i>GW</i> quasiparticle energies evaluated\nfrom various starting points. It turns out that CC2 and ADC(2.5) are\nthe most accurate models among those with respective O(N5) and O(N6) scalings with system size. In contrast,\nCCSD does not outperform CC2. The best performing exchange–correlation\nfunctionals include BMK, M06–2X, M06-SX, CAM-B3LYP, ωB97X-D,\nand LH20t, with average deviations of approximately 0.20 eV or slightly\nbelow. Errors on vertical excitation energies can be further reduced\nby considering double hybrids. Both SOS-ωB88PP86 and SOS-ωPBEPP86\nexhibit particularly attractive performances with overall quality\non par with CC2, whereas PBE0-DH and PBE-QIDH are only slightly less\nefficient. BSE/ev<i>GW</i> calculations based on Kohn–Sham\nstarting points have been found to be particularly effective for singlet\ntransitions, but much less for their triplet counterparts.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00906.s001
Primary Topic
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference CC3 Excitation\nEnergies for Organic Chromophores:\nBenchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/GW, and Wave Function Methods

Figshare
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
article

Reference CC3 Excitation\nEnergies for Organic Chromophores:\nBenchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/GW, and Wave Function Methods

article en

Abstract

To expand the QUEST database of highly accurate vertical\ntransition\nenergies, we consider a series of large organic chromogens ubiquitous\nin dye chemistry, such as anthraquinone, azobenzene, BODIPY, and naphthalimide.\nWe compute, at the CC3 level of theory, the singlet and triplet vertical\ntransition energies associated with the low-lying excited states.\nThis leads to a collection of more than 120 new highly accurate excitation\nenergies. For several singlet transitions, we have been able to determine\nCCSDT transition energies with a compact basis set, finding minimal\ndeviations from the CC3 values for most states. Subsequently, we employ\nthese reference values to benchmark a series of lower-order wave function\napproaches, including the popular ADC(2) and CC2 schemes, as well\nas time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT), both with and\nwithout applying the Tamm–Dancoff approximation (TDA). At the\nTD-DFT level, we evaluate a large panel of global, range-separated,\nlocal, and double hybrid functionals. Additionally, we assess the\nperformance of the Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism\nrelying on both <i>G</i><sub>0</sub><i>W</i><sub>0</sub> and ev<i>GW</i> quasiparticle energies evaluated\nfrom various starting points. It turns out that CC2 and ADC(2.5) are\nthe most accurate models among those with respective O(N5) and O(N6) scalings with system size. In contrast,\nCCSD does not outperform CC2. The best performing exchange–correlation\nfunctionals include BMK, M06–2X, M06-SX, CAM-B3LYP, ωB97X-D,\nand LH20t, with average deviations of approximately 0.20 eV or slightly\nbelow. Errors on vertical excitation energies can be further reduced\nby considering double hybrids. Both SOS-ωB88PP86 and SOS-ωPBEPP86\nexhibit particularly attractive performances with overall quality\non par with CC2, whereas PBE0-DH and PBE-QIDH are only slightly less\nefficient. BSE/ev<i>GW</i> calculations based on Kohn–Sham\nstarting points have been found to be particularly effective for singlet\ntransitions, but much less for their triplet counterparts.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reference CC3 Excitation\nEnergies for Organic Chromophores:\nBenchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/<i>GW</i>, and Wave Function Methods · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS