Enabling Automation\nof de Novo Catalyst Design: An\nExperimentally Validated, Multifactor Design Metric for Olefin Metathesis

Automated methods for molecular design navigate chemical\nspace\nby ranking candidate compounds against predefined, numerical design\nmetrics. To date, metrics for homogeneous catalysts focus on catalyst\nactivity as the sole criterion, neglecting performance-critical factors\nsuch as stability and degradation. Here we introduce a general, multifactor\ndesign metric for molecular catalysts, and highlight the opportunities\ncreated by mechanistically-based de novo design by implementing this\nmetric within the showcase application of olefin metathesis. Ruthenium-catalyzed\nolefin metathesis offers a prominent context within which the central\nimportance of catalyst degradation is now widely acknowledged, and\nmechanistic understanding of the decomposition pathways has reached\nan advanced stage. A numerical figure of merit (or “fitness\nscore”) for these catalysts is generated by combining functions\nbased on DFT-calculated relative energies, which describe (i) catalyst\ninitiation, (ii) catalyst activity in the metathesis of terminal olefins,\n(iii) catalyst stability–specifically, resistance to decomposition\nvia β-hydride elimination, (iv) the synthetic accessibility\nof the precatalyst, and (v) its thermodynamic stability in the <i>trans</i>-anionic geometry essential for high activity. By comparing\ncalculated fitness scores with catalytic turnovers measured in benchmark\nolefin metathesis reactions, we demonstrate that this multifactor\nfitness function reproduces the experimental ranking and productivity\ntrend for catalysts known to exhibit profoundly different susceptibilities\nto decomposition. The trend cannot be reproduced by considering in\nisolation any of the individual factors, including catalytic activity\nor resistance to β-hydride elimination. The fitness formulation\npresented here establishes a foundation for automated screening and\ndesign of improved catalysts for olefin metathesis. More broadly,\nit establishes a general strategy for development of multifactor design\nmetrics for molecular catalysts that incorporate mechanistic understanding\nof catalyst activity, stability, and synthetic accessibility.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c06212.s001
Primary Topic
Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling Automation\nof de Novo Catalyst Design: An\nExperimentally Validated, Multifactor Design Metric for Olefin Metathesis

Figshare
Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
article

Enabling Automation\nof de Novo Catalyst Design: An\nExperimentally Validated, Multifactor Design Metric for Olefin Metathesis

article en

Abstract

Automated methods for molecular design navigate chemical\nspace\nby ranking candidate compounds against predefined, numerical design\nmetrics. To date, metrics for homogeneous catalysts focus on catalyst\nactivity as the sole criterion, neglecting performance-critical factors\nsuch as stability and degradation. Here we introduce a general, multifactor\ndesign metric for molecular catalysts, and highlight the opportunities\ncreated by mechanistically-based de novo design by implementing this\nmetric within the showcase application of olefin metathesis. Ruthenium-catalyzed\nolefin metathesis offers a prominent context within which the central\nimportance of catalyst degradation is now widely acknowledged, and\nmechanistic understanding of the decomposition pathways has reached\nan advanced stage. A numerical figure of merit (or “fitness\nscore”) for these catalysts is generated by combining functions\nbased on DFT-calculated relative energies, which describe (i) catalyst\ninitiation, (ii) catalyst activity in the metathesis of terminal olefins,\n(iii) catalyst stability–specifically, resistance to decomposition\nvia β-hydride elimination, (iv) the synthetic accessibility\nof the precatalyst, and (v) its thermodynamic stability in the <i>trans</i>-anionic geometry essential for high activity. By comparing\ncalculated fitness scores with catalytic turnovers measured in benchmark\nolefin metathesis reactions, we demonstrate that this multifactor\nfitness function reproduces the experimental ranking and productivity\ntrend for catalysts known to exhibit profoundly different susceptibilities\nto decomposition. The trend cannot be reproduced by considering in\nisolation any of the individual factors, including catalytic activity\nor resistance to β-hydride elimination. The fitness formulation\npresented here establishes a foundation for automated screening and\ndesign of improved catalysts for olefin metathesis. More broadly,\nit establishes a general strategy for development of multifactor design\nmetrics for molecular catalysts that incorporate mechanistic understanding\nof catalyst activity, stability, and synthetic accessibility.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.