The Role of Hydrogenin Decarbonizing U.S. Iron andSteel Production

This study investigates the role of hydrogen as a decarbonization strategy for the iron and steel industry in the United States (U.S.) in the presence of an economy-wide net zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions target. Our analysis shows that hydrogen-based direct reduced iron (H<sub>2</sub>DRI) provides a cost-effective decarbonization strategy only under a relatively narrow set of conditions. Using today’s best estimates of the capital and variable costs of alternative decarbonized iron and steelmaking technologies in a U.S. economy-wide simulation framework, we find that carbon capture technologies can achieve comparable decarbonization levels by 2050 and greater cumulative emissions reductions from iron and steel production at a lower cost. Simulations suggest hydrogen contributes to economy-wide decarbonization, but H<sub>2</sub>DRI is not the preferred use case for hydrogen in most scenarios. The average abatement cost for U.S. iron and steel production could be as low as $70/tonne CO<sub>2</sub> with existing technologies plus carbon capture, while the cost with H<sub>2</sub>DRI rises to over $500/tonne CO<sub>2</sub>. We also find that IRA tax credits are insufficient to spur hydrogen use in steelmaking in our model and that a green steel production tax credit would need to be as high as $300/tonne steel to lead to sustained H<sub>2</sub>DRI use.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c05756.s001
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Hydrogenin Decarbonizing U.S. Iron andSteel Production

Figshare
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
article

The Role of Hydrogenin Decarbonizing U.S. Iron andSteel Production

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the role of hydrogen as a decarbonization strategy for the iron and steel industry in the United States (U.S.) in the presence of an economy-wide net zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions target. Our analysis shows that hydrogen-based direct reduced iron (H<sub>2</sub>DRI) provides a cost-effective decarbonization strategy only under a relatively narrow set of conditions. Using today’s best estimates of the capital and variable costs of alternative decarbonized iron and steelmaking technologies in a U.S. economy-wide simulation framework, we find that carbon capture technologies can achieve comparable decarbonization levels by 2050 and greater cumulative emissions reductions from iron and steel production at a lower cost. Simulations suggest hydrogen contributes to economy-wide decarbonization, but H<sub>2</sub>DRI is not the preferred use case for hydrogen in most scenarios. The average abatement cost for U.S. iron and steel production could be as low as $70/tonne CO<sub>2</sub> with existing technologies plus carbon capture, while the cost with H<sub>2</sub>DRI rises to over $500/tonne CO<sub>2</sub>. We also find that IRA tax credits are insufficient to spur hydrogen use in steelmaking in our model and that a green steel production tax credit would need to be as high as $300/tonne steel to lead to sustained H<sub>2</sub>DRI use.

Figshare
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Hydrogenin Decarbonizing U.S. Iron andSteel Production · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS