Gaseous Air Pollutantsand Lung Function in FibroticInterstitial Lung Disease (fILD): Evaluation of Different SpatialAnalysis Approaches
Gaseous pollutants such as CO, NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> are linked to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILDs), particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. However, the effect of various exposure estimation methods on these findings remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate three spatial approachesnearest neighbor (NN), inverse distance weighting (IDW), and Krigingfor estimating gaseous pollutant exposures and to assess how these methods affect health outcome estimates in fILD patients. A 10-fold cross-validation showed that Kriging had the lowest prediction error compared to NN and IDW, with RMSE for CO = 0.43 ppm (11%), O<sub>3</sub> = 5.9 ppb (14%), SO<sub>2</sub> = 2.7 ppb (12%), and NO<sub>2</sub> = 7.6 ppb (9%), respectively. Kriging also excelled over other methods across wide spatial and temporal ranges, showing the highest spatial <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> for CO and O<sub>3</sub> and the highest temporal R<sup>2</sup> for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>. In a large cohort of patients with fILD, higher levels of CO, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub> exposure were associated with lower pulmonary function. The magnitude of association and its precision were higher in SO<sub>2</sub> and CO estimated by the Kriging method. This study underscores Kriging as a robust method for estimating gaseous pollutant levels and offers valuable insights for future epidemiological studies.
Publication Details
- Journal
- Figshare
- Published
- 2025-03-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c11275.s001
- Primary Topic
- Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00