Gaseous Air Pollutantsand Lung Function in FibroticInterstitial Lung Disease (fILD): Evaluation of Different SpatialAnalysis Approaches

Gaseous pollutants such as CO, NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> are linked to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILDs), particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. However, the effect of various exposure estimation methods on these findings remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate three spatial approachesnearest neighbor (NN), inverse distance weighting (IDW), and Krigingfor estimating gaseous pollutant exposures and to assess how these methods affect health outcome estimates in fILD patients. A 10-fold cross-validation showed that Kriging had the lowest prediction error compared to NN and IDW, with RMSE for CO = 0.43 ppm (11%), O<sub>3</sub> = 5.9 ppb (14%), SO<sub>2</sub> = 2.7 ppb (12%), and NO<sub>2</sub> = 7.6 ppb (9%), respectively. Kriging also excelled over other methods across wide spatial and temporal ranges, showing the highest spatial <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> for CO and O<sub>3</sub> and the highest temporal R<sup>2</sup> for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>. In a large cohort of patients with fILD, higher levels of CO, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub> exposure were associated with lower pulmonary function. The magnitude of association and its precision were higher in SO<sub>2</sub> and CO estimated by the Kriging method. This study underscores Kriging as a robust method for estimating gaseous pollutant levels and offers valuable insights for future epidemiological studies.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c11275.s001
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaseous Air Pollutantsand Lung Function in FibroticInterstitial Lung Disease (fILD): Evaluation of Different SpatialAnalysis Approaches

Figshare
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
article

Gaseous Air Pollutantsand Lung Function in FibroticInterstitial Lung Disease (fILD): Evaluation of Different SpatialAnalysis Approaches

article en

Abstract

Gaseous pollutants such as CO, NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> are linked to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILDs), particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. However, the effect of various exposure estimation methods on these findings remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate three spatial approachesnearest neighbor (NN), inverse distance weighting (IDW), and Krigingfor estimating gaseous pollutant exposures and to assess how these methods affect health outcome estimates in fILD patients. A 10-fold cross-validation showed that Kriging had the lowest prediction error compared to NN and IDW, with RMSE for CO = 0.43 ppm (11%), O<sub>3</sub> = 5.9 ppb (14%), SO<sub>2</sub> = 2.7 ppb (12%), and NO<sub>2</sub> = 7.6 ppb (9%), respectively. Kriging also excelled over other methods across wide spatial and temporal ranges, showing the highest spatial <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> for CO and O<sub>3</sub> and the highest temporal R<sup>2</sup> for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>. In a large cohort of patients with fILD, higher levels of CO, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub> exposure were associated with lower pulmonary function. The magnitude of association and its precision were higher in SO<sub>2</sub> and CO estimated by the Kriging method. This study underscores Kriging as a robust method for estimating gaseous pollutant levels and offers valuable insights for future epidemiological studies.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.