Personal and family tax advantages granted to non-residents: the ECJ takes a step further

Member-States typically reserve certain family and personal tax allowances to residents, given that they (i.e., the States of residence) are deemed better placed than any other State to consider the personal and family situation of any taxpayer. Non-residents, being excluded from these tax allowances, risk being put in an unfavourable position. The article discusses the challenges faced by non-residents in the European Union regarding personal and family tax advantages, focusing on the disparities in tax systems that hinder mobility across Member States. It centres on the CJEU case law of Commission v. Belgium (C-60/21), in which the Court held that the Belgian deductibility of allowances, which was subject to certain conditions for non-residents of Belgium, violated the free movement of workers guaranteed by article 45 of the TFEU. The author examines previous CJEU case law, including Schumacker, Imfeld, and Renneberg, to illustrate how the Court has interpreted similar scenarios and emphasised the need for Member States to consider personal circumstances for non-residents taxation as well.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Bologna
Published
2025-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-3583/21346
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal and family tax advantages granted to non-residents: the ECJ takes a step further

Università degli Studi di Bologna
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Personal and family tax advantages granted to non-residents: the ECJ takes a step further

article en

Abstract

Member-States typically reserve certain family and personal tax allowances to residents, given that they (i.e., the States of residence) are deemed better placed than any other State to consider the personal and family situation of any taxpayer. Non-residents, being excluded from these tax allowances, risk being put in an unfavourable position. The article discusses the challenges faced by non-residents in the European Union regarding personal and family tax advantages, focusing on the disparities in tax systems that hinder mobility across Member States. It centres on the CJEU case law of Commission v. Belgium (C-60/21), in which the Court held that the Belgian deductibility of allowances, which was subject to certain conditions for non-residents of Belgium, violated the free movement of workers guaranteed by article 45 of the TFEU. The author examines previous CJEU case law, including Schumacker, Imfeld, and Renneberg, to illustrate how the Court has interpreted similar scenarios and emphasised the need for Member States to consider personal circumstances for non-residents taxation as well.

Università degli Studi di Bologna
UCLouvain (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Personal and family tax advantages granted to non-residents: the ECJ takes a step further · Università degli Studi di Bologna (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS