Defect Passivation:\nPhysisorption or Chemisorption?\nA Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Study

Nonradiative charge recombination, originating from defects,\nlimits\nthe use of semiconductors in solar energy conversion technologies.\nDefect passivation is an effective approach to eliminating charge\nrecombination centers. Focusing on InSe semiconductor, we have shown\nthat the adsorption configurations of passivators have a strong impact\non the defect passivation, using nonadiabatic molecular dynamics combined\nwith time-dependent density functional theory. The simulations demonstrate\nthat the physisorption passivator cannot eliminate the recombination\ncenters, resulting in fast nonradiative charge recombination. By\ncontrast, the chemisorption passivators are able to form covalent\nbonds with indium, remove the charge recombination centers, thereby\nprolonging the charge recombination time by more than a factor of\n10 because of the decreased nonadiabatic coupling and channels for\ncharge and energy losses. This study uncovers the microscopic effects\nof the adsorption configurations of passivators on the photogenerated\ncharge carrier dynamics, suggesting that chemisorption passivators\nare essential for defect passivation.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02357.s001
Primary Topic
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defect Passivation:\nPhysisorption or Chemisorption?\nA Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Study

Figshare
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
article

Defect Passivation:\nPhysisorption or Chemisorption?\nA Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Study

article en

Abstract

Nonradiative charge recombination, originating from defects,\nlimits\nthe use of semiconductors in solar energy conversion technologies.\nDefect passivation is an effective approach to eliminating charge\nrecombination centers. Focusing on InSe semiconductor, we have shown\nthat the adsorption configurations of passivators have a strong impact\non the defect passivation, using nonadiabatic molecular dynamics combined\nwith time-dependent density functional theory. The simulations demonstrate\nthat the physisorption passivator cannot eliminate the recombination\ncenters, resulting in fast nonradiative charge recombination. By\ncontrast, the chemisorption passivators are able to form covalent\nbonds with indium, remove the charge recombination centers, thereby\nprolonging the charge recombination time by more than a factor of\n10 because of the decreased nonadiabatic coupling and channels for\ncharge and energy losses. This study uncovers the microscopic effects\nof the adsorption configurations of passivators on the photogenerated\ncharge carrier dynamics, suggesting that chemisorption passivators\nare essential for defect passivation.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defect Passivation:\nPhysisorption or Chemisorption?\nA Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Study · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS