C–P\nBond Cleavage Through Hydrogenation in\nRuthenium Complexes Supported by P,N Ligands

The reactivity of ruthenium hydride complexes supported\nby 2-((di-<i>tert</i>-butylphosphaneyl)methyl)pyridine, <b>L1</b> and\n2-(di-<i>tert</i>-butylphosphaneyl)pyridine, <b>L2</b>, was explored. The reaction of {Ru(COD)Cl<sub>2</sub>}<sub><i>x</i></sub> with <b>L1</b> in the presence of base and\n10 bar of H<sub>2</sub> gave the expected complex [Ru(L1)<sub>2</sub>(H)Cl], <b>1</b>, while the same reaction with <b>L2</b> gave [Ru(L2)(P(H)<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu<sub>2</sub>)(H)Cl], <b>2</b>, that results from the cleavage of a C–P bond. We\nwere able to establish that under the reaction conditions the first\nspecies formed is [Ru(L2)<sub>2</sub>(H)Cl], <b>3</b>, and that\nthis species decomposes to give complex <b>2</b> and is in equilibrium\nwith [Ru(L<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>], <b>4</b>. The proposed mechanism obtained by DFT has the protonation of the\ncarbon as the highest energy step (38.9 kcal/mol), consistent with\na slow reaction. Preliminary studies reveal that complex <b>2</b> is a very active catalyst in the hydrogenation of benzaldehyde (TONs\nup to 44,000).

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c04275.s001
Primary Topic
Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C–P\nBond Cleavage Through Hydrogenation in\nRuthenium Complexes Supported by P,N Ligands

Figshare
Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
article

C–P\nBond Cleavage Through Hydrogenation in\nRuthenium Complexes Supported by P,N Ligands

article en

Abstract

The reactivity of ruthenium hydride complexes supported\nby 2-((di-<i>tert</i>-butylphosphaneyl)methyl)pyridine, <b>L1</b> and\n2-(di-<i>tert</i>-butylphosphaneyl)pyridine, <b>L2</b>, was explored. The reaction of {Ru(COD)Cl<sub>2</sub>}<sub><i>x</i></sub> with <b>L1</b> in the presence of base and\n10 bar of H<sub>2</sub> gave the expected complex [Ru(L1)<sub>2</sub>(H)Cl], <b>1</b>, while the same reaction with <b>L2</b> gave [Ru(L2)(P(H)<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu<sub>2</sub>)(H)Cl], <b>2</b>, that results from the cleavage of a C–P bond. We\nwere able to establish that under the reaction conditions the first\nspecies formed is [Ru(L2)<sub>2</sub>(H)Cl], <b>3</b>, and that\nthis species decomposes to give complex <b>2</b> and is in equilibrium\nwith [Ru(L<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>], <b>4</b>. The proposed mechanism obtained by DFT has the protonation of the\ncarbon as the highest energy step (38.9 kcal/mol), consistent with\na slow reaction. Preliminary studies reveal that complex <b>2</b> is a very active catalyst in the hydrogenation of benzaldehyde (TONs\nup to 44,000).

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

C–P\nBond Cleavage Through Hydrogenation in\nRuthenium Complexes Supported by P,N Ligands · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS