Impact of CathodeComponents’ Configurationon the Performance of Forward-Bias Bipolar Membrane CO<sub>2</sub>‑Electrolyzers

Zero-gap CO<sub>2</sub>-electrolyzers using a forward bias bipolar membrane (BPM) are becoming increasingly appealing, since this configuration addresses the issues of CO<sub>2</sub> pumping and salt precipitation observed with other approaches. However, such CO<sub>2</sub>-electrolyzers often suffer from BPM-delamination caused by the generation of water and gaseous CO<sub>2</sub> at the junction between cation- and anion-exchange membranes. To circumvent this, in this study we used a rigid titanium porous transport layer (PTL) at the cathode to mechanically suppress the membrane delamination and managed to operate such cells at current densities >100 mA·cm<sup>–2</sup>. In doing so, we compared the performance differences caused by the implementation of a catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) or a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) at the cell’s cathode. These combinations of diffusion media and catalyst layer (CL) deposition approaches result in five different configurations that systematically featured a current-driven rise in high-frequency resistance (HFR) and CO selectivity when operated at current densities <100 mA·cm<sup>–2</sup>, whereas at current densities >100 mA·cm<sup>–2</sup>, both HFR and CO selectivity decreased. By determining the water balance at the cathode compartment and BPM-junction, we propose that variations in membrane-CL humidification are tied to this unambiguous correlation between HFR and selectivity across all tested configurations, which we attribute to the concomitant changes in water and ion distribution (and thus pH) along this key operational interface.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c02883.s001
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of CathodeComponents’ Configurationon the Performance of Forward-Bias Bipolar Membrane CO2‑Electrolyzers

Figshare
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
article

Impact of CathodeComponents’ Configurationon the Performance of Forward-Bias Bipolar Membrane CO2‑Electrolyzers

article en

Abstract

Zero-gap CO<sub>2</sub>-electrolyzers using a forward bias bipolar membrane (BPM) are becoming increasingly appealing, since this configuration addresses the issues of CO<sub>2</sub> pumping and salt precipitation observed with other approaches. However, such CO<sub>2</sub>-electrolyzers often suffer from BPM-delamination caused by the generation of water and gaseous CO<sub>2</sub> at the junction between cation- and anion-exchange membranes. To circumvent this, in this study we used a rigid titanium porous transport layer (PTL) at the cathode to mechanically suppress the membrane delamination and managed to operate such cells at current densities >100 mA·cm<sup>–2</sup>. In doing so, we compared the performance differences caused by the implementation of a catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) or a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) at the cell’s cathode. These combinations of diffusion media and catalyst layer (CL) deposition approaches result in five different configurations that systematically featured a current-driven rise in high-frequency resistance (HFR) and CO selectivity when operated at current densities <100 mA·cm<sup>–2</sup>, whereas at current densities >100 mA·cm<sup>–2</sup>, both HFR and CO selectivity decreased. By determining the water balance at the cathode compartment and BPM-junction, we propose that variations in membrane-CL humidification are tied to this unambiguous correlation between HFR and selectivity across all tested configurations, which we attribute to the concomitant changes in water and ion distribution (and thus pH) along this key operational interface.

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.