The Marshmallow Test as a Screening Instrument: Sensitivity and Specificity of a Delay of Gratification Task for Later <scp>ADHD</scp> and Conduct Problems

ABSTRACT Delay of gratification tasks have an impressive predictive value for various outcomes and are designed to measure self‐regulation. Since many behavioural and psychological conditions in children are related to limitations in self‐regulation, the extent to which delay tasks can be used as a screening for the detection of psychopathology is examined. Children from the general population (non‐clinical sample; N = 1498; 51% girls) participated in delay tasks at the ages of 3 and 5. Parents rated ADHD and conduct problems when children were age 5 and 6, which we classified using cut‐offs. Delay at age 3 was related to ADHD at age 5 (OR = 1.84) and conduct at age 6 (OR = 2.61). The results showed high specificity (77%–78%) and high negative predictive values (95%–98%), correctly identifying children below the SDQ cut‐off, but low sensitivity (27%–42%), making the task unsuitable as a screening tool for children with an increased likelihood of developing psychopathology. These results were aggravated when only the first 20 s were considered, showing better specificity but worse sensitivity values.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infant and Child Development
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.70014
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Marshmallow Test as a Screening Instrument: Sensitivity and Specificity of a Delay of Gratification Task for Later ADHD and Conduct Problems

Infant and Child Development
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

The Marshmallow Test as a Screening Instrument: Sensitivity and Specificity of a Delay of Gratification Task for Later ADHD and Conduct Problems

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Delay of gratification tasks have an impressive predictive value for various outcomes and are designed to measure self‐regulation. Since many behavioural and psychological conditions in children are related to limitations in self‐regulation, the extent to which delay tasks can be used as a screening for the detection of psychopathology is examined. Children from the general population (non‐clinical sample; N = 1498; 51% girls) participated in delay tasks at the ages of 3 and 5. Parents rated ADHD and conduct problems when children were age 5 and 6, which we classified using cut‐offs. Delay at age 3 was related to ADHD at age 5 (OR = 1.84) and conduct at age 6 (OR = 2.61). The results showed high specificity (77%–78%) and high negative predictive values (95%–98%), correctly identifying children below the SDQ cut‐off, but low sensitivity (27%–42%), making the task unsuitable as a screening tool for children with an increased likelihood of developing psychopathology. These results were aggravated when only the first 20 s were considered, showing better specificity but worse sensitivity values.

Infant and Child DevelopmentVol. 34(2)
Helmut Schmidt University (DE), University of Münster (DE), Individual Development and Adaptive Education (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.