Rethinking Thin-Layer\nChromatography for Screening\nTechnetium-99m Radiolabeled Polymer Nanoparticles

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is commonly employed\nto screen\ntechnetium-99m labeled polymer nanoparticle batches for unreduced\npertechnetate and radio-colloidal impurities. Although this method\nis widely accepted, our findings applying radiolabeled PLGA/PLA–PEG\nnanoparticles underscore its lack of transferability between different\nsettings and its limitations as a standalone quality control tool.\nWhile TLC profiles may appear similar for purified and radiocolloid\ncontaining nanoparticle formulations, their in vivo behavior can vary\nsignificantly, as demonstrated by discrepancies between TLC results\nand single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and biodistribution\ndata. This highlights the urgent need for a case-by-case evaluation\nof TLC methods for each specific nanoparticle type. Our study revealed\nthat polymeric nanoparticles cannot be considered analytically uniform\nentities in the context of TLC analysis, emphasizing the complex interplay\nbetween nanoparticle composition, radiolabeling conditions, and subsequent\nbiological behavior.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.4c00383.s001
Primary Topic
Historical Geography and Cartography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Thin-Layer\nChromatography for Screening\nTechnetium-99m Radiolabeled Polymer Nanoparticles

Figshare
Historical Geography and Cartography
article

Rethinking Thin-Layer\nChromatography for Screening\nTechnetium-99m Radiolabeled Polymer Nanoparticles

article en

Abstract

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is commonly employed\nto screen\ntechnetium-99m labeled polymer nanoparticle batches for unreduced\npertechnetate and radio-colloidal impurities. Although this method\nis widely accepted, our findings applying radiolabeled PLGA/PLA–PEG\nnanoparticles underscore its lack of transferability between different\nsettings and its limitations as a standalone quality control tool.\nWhile TLC profiles may appear similar for purified and radiocolloid\ncontaining nanoparticle formulations, their in vivo behavior can vary\nsignificantly, as demonstrated by discrepancies between TLC results\nand single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and biodistribution\ndata. This highlights the urgent need for a case-by-case evaluation\nof TLC methods for each specific nanoparticle type. Our study revealed\nthat polymeric nanoparticles cannot be considered analytically uniform\nentities in the context of TLC analysis, emphasizing the complex interplay\nbetween nanoparticle composition, radiolabeling conditions, and subsequent\nbiological behavior.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Historical Geography and Cartography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.