DFT Insights intoHydrogen Spillover Mechanisms: Effectsof Metal Species, Size, and Support

Hydrogen spillover is a crucial mechanism in heterogeneous catalysis. Herein, density functional theory calculations were conducted to study the metal–support interactions (MSI) and the hydrogen spillover mechanisms in terms of metal size, metal species, and support effects using single-atom (M<sub>1</sub>) and four-atom cluster (M<sub>4</sub>) models of Ru, Ni, and Pt, supported on anatase TiO<sub>2</sub>(101), rutile TiO<sub>2</sub>(110), MgO(100), MgO(110), and graphene. For M<sub>1</sub> systems, the binding energies (<i>E</i><sub>b</sub>) vary widely across different M<sub>1</sub> species and substrate surfaces. In contrast to M<sub>1</sub> systems whose MSI are affected by metal type, those supported M<sub>4</sub> models are determined primarily by the support: r-TiO<sub>2</sub>(110) > a-TiO<sub>2</sub>(101) > MgO(110) > MgO(100) > graphene. Thermodynamically favorable hydrogen spillover on oxide-supported M<sub>1</sub> models required hydrogen coverages (θ) of ∼6 ML, whereas counterpart M<sub>4</sub> systems require ∼3 ML. Therefore, oxide-supported cluster catalysts can facilitate favorable hydrogen spillover better than single-atom catalysts; hydrogen spillover to TiO<sub>2</sub> is more favorable than to MgO. In contrast, no favorable hydrogen spillover was observed on graphene-supported M<sub>1</sub> and M<sub>4</sub> models. Despite considering the same route, different hydrogen spillover mechanisms are observed depending on the support: (i) on reducible TiO<sub>2</sub>, hydrogen spills over as a proton with the electron transferred to the support; (ii) on nonreducible MgO, hydrogen spills over as a proton but the electron remains localized to the bound metal; (iii) on graphene, hydrogen spills over as a neutral hydrogen atom. Notably, supported M<sub>4</sub> models with stronger MSI are predicted to exhibit a more facile hydrogen spillover from both thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives, particularly when considering the same metal species across different supports. These detailed insights are expected to advance the understanding of hydrogen spillover on catalysts, which will be valuable for their future design and development.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08097.s001
Primary Topic
Libraries and Information Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DFT Insights intoHydrogen Spillover Mechanisms: Effectsof Metal Species, Size, and Support

Figshare
Libraries and Information Services
article

DFT Insights intoHydrogen Spillover Mechanisms: Effectsof Metal Species, Size, and Support

article en

Abstract

Hydrogen spillover is a crucial mechanism in heterogeneous catalysis. Herein, density functional theory calculations were conducted to study the metal–support interactions (MSI) and the hydrogen spillover mechanisms in terms of metal size, metal species, and support effects using single-atom (M<sub>1</sub>) and four-atom cluster (M<sub>4</sub>) models of Ru, Ni, and Pt, supported on anatase TiO<sub>2</sub>(101), rutile TiO<sub>2</sub>(110), MgO(100), MgO(110), and graphene. For M<sub>1</sub> systems, the binding energies (<i>E</i><sub>b</sub>) vary widely across different M<sub>1</sub> species and substrate surfaces. In contrast to M<sub>1</sub> systems whose MSI are affected by metal type, those supported M<sub>4</sub> models are determined primarily by the support: r-TiO<sub>2</sub>(110) > a-TiO<sub>2</sub>(101) > MgO(110) > MgO(100) > graphene. Thermodynamically favorable hydrogen spillover on oxide-supported M<sub>1</sub> models required hydrogen coverages (θ) of ∼6 ML, whereas counterpart M<sub>4</sub> systems require ∼3 ML. Therefore, oxide-supported cluster catalysts can facilitate favorable hydrogen spillover better than single-atom catalysts; hydrogen spillover to TiO<sub>2</sub> is more favorable than to MgO. In contrast, no favorable hydrogen spillover was observed on graphene-supported M<sub>1</sub> and M<sub>4</sub> models. Despite considering the same route, different hydrogen spillover mechanisms are observed depending on the support: (i) on reducible TiO<sub>2</sub>, hydrogen spills over as a proton with the electron transferred to the support; (ii) on nonreducible MgO, hydrogen spills over as a proton but the electron remains localized to the bound metal; (iii) on graphene, hydrogen spills over as a neutral hydrogen atom. Notably, supported M<sub>4</sub> models with stronger MSI are predicted to exhibit a more facile hydrogen spillover from both thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives, particularly when considering the same metal species across different supports. These detailed insights are expected to advance the understanding of hydrogen spillover on catalysts, which will be valuable for their future design and development.

Figshare
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Libraries and Information Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.