Investigating\nthe Use of Novel Blood Processing Methods\nto Boost the Identification of Biomarkers for Non-Small Cell Lung\nCancer: A Proof of Concept

Diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) currently\nrelies\non imaging; however, these methods are not effective for detecting\nearly stage disease. Investigating blood-based protein biomarkers\naims to simplify the diagnostic process and identify disease-associated\nchanges before they can be seen by using imaging techniques. In this\nstudy, plasma and frozen whole blood cell pellets from NSCLC patients\nand healthy controls were processed using both classical and novel\ntechniques to produce a unique set of four sample types from a single\nblood draw. These samples were analyzed using 12 immunoassays and\nliquid chromatography–mass spectrometry to collectively screen\n3974 proteins. Analysis of all fractions produced a set of 522 differentially\nexpressed proteins, with conventional blood analysis (proteomic analysis\nof plasma) accounting for only 7 of the total. Boosted regression\ntree analysis of the differentially expressed proteins produced a\npanel of 13 proteins that were able to discriminate between controls\nand NSCLC patients, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.864\nfor the set. Our rapid and reproducible (<10% CV for technical\nreplicates) blood preparation and analysis methods enabled the production\nof high-quality data from only 30 μL of complex samples that\ntypically require significant fractionation prior to proteomic analysis.\nWith our methods, almost 4000 proteins were identified from a single\nfraction over a 62.5 min gradient by LC-MS/MS.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00829.s001
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating\nthe Use of Novel Blood Processing Methods\nto Boost the Identification of Biomarkers for Non-Small Cell Lung\nCancer: A Proof of Concept

Figshare
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Investigating\nthe Use of Novel Blood Processing Methods\nto Boost the Identification of Biomarkers for Non-Small Cell Lung\nCancer: A Proof of Concept

article en

Abstract

Diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) currently\nrelies\non imaging; however, these methods are not effective for detecting\nearly stage disease. Investigating blood-based protein biomarkers\naims to simplify the diagnostic process and identify disease-associated\nchanges before they can be seen by using imaging techniques. In this\nstudy, plasma and frozen whole blood cell pellets from NSCLC patients\nand healthy controls were processed using both classical and novel\ntechniques to produce a unique set of four sample types from a single\nblood draw. These samples were analyzed using 12 immunoassays and\nliquid chromatography–mass spectrometry to collectively screen\n3974 proteins. Analysis of all fractions produced a set of 522 differentially\nexpressed proteins, with conventional blood analysis (proteomic analysis\nof plasma) accounting for only 7 of the total. Boosted regression\ntree analysis of the differentially expressed proteins produced a\npanel of 13 proteins that were able to discriminate between controls\nand NSCLC patients, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.864\nfor the set. Our rapid and reproducible (<10% CV for technical\nreplicates) blood preparation and analysis methods enabled the production\nof high-quality data from only 30 μL of complex samples that\ntypically require significant fractionation prior to proteomic analysis.\nWith our methods, almost 4000 proteins were identified from a single\nfraction over a 62.5 min gradient by LC-MS/MS.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.