Identifying\nQuantum Interference Effects from Joint\nConductance–Thermopower Statistics

Although quantum\neffects are thought to dominate the heat and charge\ntransport through molecular junctions, large uncertainties in chemical\nstructure, lead-molecule coupling strengths, and energy levels make\nit difficult to definitively identify these effects from the measured\nthermopower <i>S</i> and conductance <i>G</i> distributions\nalone. Here, we develop a simple statistical method to identify destructive\nquantum interference features (nodes) through the anticorrelation\nbetween simultaneously measured <i>G</i> and <i>S</i> values. We find these correlations can be used to unambiguously\nidentify far-detuned nodes, even when <i>G</i> and <i>S</i> distributions alone cannot. As an example, we consider\nseveral para- and meta-configured systems, including benzenediamine\nand diiodo-terphenyl-based junctions, finding that nodes can be identified\nin ensembles with broad level-alignment and lead-molecule coupling\ndistributions, and with significant anodal transport contributions,\nincluding from vacuum tunneling. The efficacy and limitations of this\nmethod are analyzed.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04439.s001
Primary Topic
Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying\nQuantum Interference Effects from Joint\nConductance–Thermopower Statistics

Figshare
Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
article

Identifying\nQuantum Interference Effects from Joint\nConductance–Thermopower Statistics

article en

Abstract

Although quantum\neffects are thought to dominate the heat and charge\ntransport through molecular junctions, large uncertainties in chemical\nstructure, lead-molecule coupling strengths, and energy levels make\nit difficult to definitively identify these effects from the measured\nthermopower <i>S</i> and conductance <i>G</i> distributions\nalone. Here, we develop a simple statistical method to identify destructive\nquantum interference features (nodes) through the anticorrelation\nbetween simultaneously measured <i>G</i> and <i>S</i> values. We find these correlations can be used to unambiguously\nidentify far-detuned nodes, even when <i>G</i> and <i>S</i> distributions alone cannot. As an example, we consider\nseveral para- and meta-configured systems, including benzenediamine\nand diiodo-terphenyl-based junctions, finding that nodes can be identified\nin ensembles with broad level-alignment and lead-molecule coupling\ndistributions, and with significant anodal transport contributions,\nincluding from vacuum tunneling. The efficacy and limitations of this\nmethod are analyzed.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identifying\nQuantum Interference Effects from Joint\nConductance–Thermopower Statistics · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS