Saline Brine Separation:\nThermodynamic and Techno-Economic\nComparison of Counterflow Reverse Osmosis with Electrodialysis

Separation into a more concentrated and a diluted stream\nis an\nenergy-efficient alternative to thermal distillation for saline brine\nmanagement. Here, we compare counterflow reverse osmosis (CFRO) with\nelectrodialysis (ED) for brine separation in terms of energy consumption\nand overall treatment cost. Conditions for energy-optimal thermodynamically\nequipartitioned operation are derived for both technologies. The brine-reflux\nCFRO configuration requires more energy/module area than does the\nsplit-feed design but can be operated at practical pressure levels\nfor high-salinity applications. After identification of the cost-optimal\nvoltage in ED and pressure in CFRO, realistic single-stage systems,\nincluding losses, are compared. CFRO consumes significantly lower\nenergy and is less expensive than ED for intermediate-salinity brine\nseparation, such as textile dyeing effluent recycling. Therefore,\nthis is an ideal beachhead application for CFRO compared to seawater\nbrine concentration up to near saturation, where its cost is comparable\nto that of ED.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01644.s001
Primary Topic
Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saline Brine Separation:\nThermodynamic and Techno-Economic\nComparison of Counterflow Reverse Osmosis with Electrodialysis

Figshare
Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
article

Saline Brine Separation:\nThermodynamic and Techno-Economic\nComparison of Counterflow Reverse Osmosis with Electrodialysis

article en

Abstract

Separation into a more concentrated and a diluted stream\nis an\nenergy-efficient alternative to thermal distillation for saline brine\nmanagement. Here, we compare counterflow reverse osmosis (CFRO) with\nelectrodialysis (ED) for brine separation in terms of energy consumption\nand overall treatment cost. Conditions for energy-optimal thermodynamically\nequipartitioned operation are derived for both technologies. The brine-reflux\nCFRO configuration requires more energy/module area than does the\nsplit-feed design but can be operated at practical pressure levels\nfor high-salinity applications. After identification of the cost-optimal\nvoltage in ED and pressure in CFRO, realistic single-stage systems,\nincluding losses, are compared. CFRO consumes significantly lower\nenergy and is less expensive than ED for intermediate-salinity brine\nseparation, such as textile dyeing effluent recycling. Therefore,\nthis is an ideal beachhead application for CFRO compared to seawater\nbrine concentration up to near saturation, where its cost is comparable\nto that of ED.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Saline Brine Separation:\nThermodynamic and Techno-Economic\nComparison of Counterflow Reverse Osmosis with Electrodialysis · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS