The Comparison\nof Typical Organic Solvents and Ionic\nLiquid for More Environmentally and User-Friendly Pyocyanin Extraction

Pyocyanin is a pigment that recently gained importance\nas a valuable\nchemical. Most often, the method for extraction is based on the use\nof chloroform. Therefore, an efficient and more environmentally friendly\nmethod is vital for further use. We compared organic solvents and\nionic liquids as pyocyanin extractants. We assessed the extraction\nefficiency using a pyocyanin standard and pyocyanin extracted directly\nfrom the bacterial culture. The results showed that only chloroform,\ndichloromethane, and ethyl acetate were useful for pyocyanin extraction\namong the tested organic solvents. Extraction with chloroform was\nthe most efficient method. Notably, the ionic liquid could also be\nfavorable for the extraction process, exhibiting antibacterial properties\nand being separated from the pigment by adsorbing pyocyanin on clays\nand desorbing it with ethanol. The extraction of pyocyanin can be\nled by using alternative extractants, i.e., dichloromethane or ionic\nliquid, and therefore, it can be less hazardous for the environment\nand the user.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04206.s001
Primary Topic
Ionic liquids properties and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Comparison\nof Typical Organic Solvents and Ionic\nLiquid for More Environmentally and User-Friendly Pyocyanin Extraction

Figshare
Ionic liquids properties and applications
article

The Comparison\nof Typical Organic Solvents and Ionic\nLiquid for More Environmentally and User-Friendly Pyocyanin Extraction

article en

Abstract

Pyocyanin is a pigment that recently gained importance\nas a valuable\nchemical. Most often, the method for extraction is based on the use\nof chloroform. Therefore, an efficient and more environmentally friendly\nmethod is vital for further use. We compared organic solvents and\nionic liquids as pyocyanin extractants. We assessed the extraction\nefficiency using a pyocyanin standard and pyocyanin extracted directly\nfrom the bacterial culture. The results showed that only chloroform,\ndichloromethane, and ethyl acetate were useful for pyocyanin extraction\namong the tested organic solvents. Extraction with chloroform was\nthe most efficient method. Notably, the ionic liquid could also be\nfavorable for the extraction process, exhibiting antibacterial properties\nand being separated from the pigment by adsorbing pyocyanin on clays\nand desorbing it with ethanol. The extraction of pyocyanin can be\nled by using alternative extractants, i.e., dichloromethane or ionic\nliquid, and therefore, it can be less hazardous for the environment\nand the user.

Figshare
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ionic liquids properties and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Comparison\nof Typical Organic Solvents and Ionic\nLiquid for More Environmentally and User-Friendly Pyocyanin Extraction · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS