Bayesian Optimizationof Spray Parameters for theDeposition of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–Cu<sub>2</sub>O Heterojunctions

The accelerated discovery and optimization of materials relies on the integration of advanced experimental techniques with data-driven methodologies. In this work, Bayesian optimization (BO) is applied to optimize the ultrasonic spray pyrolysis (USP) process for the deposition of copper oxides, targeting high-quality Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–Cu<sub>2</sub>O heterojunctions for optoelectronic applications. By employing BO with an initial data set of 12 samples and conducting 4 USP parameter optimization cycles, significant improvements in device performance are achieved, with the open-circuit voltage increasing from 288 to 804 mV. During the optimization process, the performance of the model declines, necessitating the identification of a reliable subset of samples from the full data set. Through the application of BO, the cross-validation error of the model is minimized based on the sample selection, whereby accuracy is restored and generalizability is achieved. The subsequent model evaluation reveals two distinct deposition regimes, each characterized by unique process conditions, leading to specific material properties and device performances. These findings not only demonstrate the application of a data-driven experimental workflow in the context of thin film deposition but also highlight the importance of robust data validation and model evaluation.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c03284.s001
Primary Topic
Ga2O3 and related materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Optimizationof Spray Parameters for theDeposition of Ga2O3–Cu2O Heterojunctions

Figshare
Ga2O3 and related materials
article

Bayesian Optimizationof Spray Parameters for theDeposition of Ga2O3–Cu2O Heterojunctions

article en

Abstract

The accelerated discovery and optimization of materials relies on the integration of advanced experimental techniques with data-driven methodologies. In this work, Bayesian optimization (BO) is applied to optimize the ultrasonic spray pyrolysis (USP) process for the deposition of copper oxides, targeting high-quality Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–Cu<sub>2</sub>O heterojunctions for optoelectronic applications. By employing BO with an initial data set of 12 samples and conducting 4 USP parameter optimization cycles, significant improvements in device performance are achieved, with the open-circuit voltage increasing from 288 to 804 mV. During the optimization process, the performance of the model declines, necessitating the identification of a reliable subset of samples from the full data set. Through the application of BO, the cross-validation error of the model is minimized based on the sample selection, whereby accuracy is restored and generalizability is achieved. The subsequent model evaluation reveals two distinct deposition regimes, each characterized by unique process conditions, leading to specific material properties and device performances. These findings not only demonstrate the application of a data-driven experimental workflow in the context of thin film deposition but also highlight the importance of robust data validation and model evaluation.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ga2O3 and related materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bayesian Optimizationof Spray Parameters for theDeposition of Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–Cu<sub>2</sub>O Heterojunctions · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS